View All News

Channelchek-in

Virtual & In-person Roadshows / Conferences

Channelchek Premium. Access more at no cost. 

The site "channelcheck" is opened on the phone

Join the Channelchek Investor Community to access equity research, video content, events, and much more. All at no cost. 

Access to Exclusive Content. FREE for Registered Users Only. 

Click “Log In” to agree to Channelchek.com <a href="#">Terms of Use</a> and acknowledge that Channelchek.com <a href="#">Privacy Policy</a> applies to you.

Welcome to the Channelchek Investor Community

Informed investors make more money. And it’s all about timing. Get it when it happens.

Inbox Intel from Channelchek.

In a dramatic market shift that caught many economists off guard, mortgage rates have tumbled to their lowest point since September 2022, following President Trump's bold announcement that government-sponsored enterprises Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac would purchase $200 billion in mortgage bonds.



The average 30-year fixed mortgage rate dropped to 6.06% this week, down from 6.16% the previous week, according to Freddie Mac data. The 15-year rate similarly declined to 5.38% from 5.46%, marking a significant milestone for prospective homebuyers and homeowners considering refinancing.



The president's January 8th social media post declaring he was "instructing my Representatives to BUY $200 BILLION DOLLARS IN MORTGAGE BONDS" sent immediate ripples through financial markets. The announcement specifically targeted mortgage-backed securities, driving up demand for these bonds and subsequently pushing their yields downward—a direct pathway to lower consumer mortgage rates.



Market response was swift and substantial. The Mortgage Bankers Association reported a 16% surge in home purchase applications and a remarkable 40% jump in refinancing applications through the following Friday. These numbers suggest Americans are eager to capitalize on improved borrowing conditions after years of elevated rates that have kept many potential buyers sidelined.



"With mortgage rates much lower than a year ago and edging closer to 6 percent, MBA expects strong interest from homeowners seeking a refinance and would-be buyers stepping off the sidelines," said Bob Broeksmit, president and CEO of the Mortgage Bankers Association.



However, industry experts are tempering expectations about a rapid housing market recovery. While lower rates provide relief, significant affordability challenges persist. Home prices remain elevated in many markets, and a substantial number of existing homeowners hold mortgages with rates far below current levels—creating what economists call the "lock-in effect" that discourages moving.



Hannah Jones, senior economic research analyst at Realtor.com, projects mortgage rates will hover in the low-6% range throughout 2026, potentially supporting "modestly improving home sales." Yet she emphasizes that any recovery will likely be "gradual rather than rapid" given persistent affordability constraints.



The policy move represents an unconventional approach to economic stimulus, directly targeting housing market conditions through government-sponsored enterprise balance sheets. While the immediate effect on rates has been clear, longer-term implications for the housing market, federal housing finance policy, and the broader economy remain subjects of intense debate among economists and policy analysts.



For now, Americans looking to enter the housing market or refinance existing mortgages have a window of opportunity that hasn't existed since rates began their historic climb in late 2022.

In a dramatic market shift that caught many economists off guard, mortgage rates have tumbled to their lowest point since September 2022, following President Trump&#8217;s bold announcement that government-sponsored enterprises Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac would purchase $200 billion in mortgage bonds.



The average 30-year fixed mortgage rate dropped to 6.06% this week, down from 6.16% the previous week, according to Freddie Mac data. The 15-year rate similarly declined to 5.38% from 5.46%, marking a significant milestone for prospective homebuyers and homeowners considering refinancing.



The president&#8217;s January 8th social media post declaring he was &#8220;instructing my Representatives to BUY $200 BILLION DOLLARS IN MORTGAGE BONDS&#8221; sent immediate ripples through financial markets. The announcement specifically targeted mortgage-backed securities, driving up demand for these bonds and subsequently pushing their yields downward—a direct pathway to lower consumer mortgage rates.



Market response was swift and substantial. The Mortgage Bankers Association reported a 16% surge in home purchase applications and a remarkable 40% jump in refinancing applications through the following Friday. These numbers suggest Americans are eager to capitalize on improved borrowing conditions after years of elevated rates that have kept many potential buyers sidelined.



&#8220;With mortgage rates much lower than a year ago and edging closer to 6 percent, MBA expects strong interest from homeowners seeking a refinance and would-be buyers stepping off the sidelines,&#8221; said Bob Broeksmit, president and CEO of the Mortgage Bankers Association.



However, industry experts are tempering expectations about a rapid housing market recovery. While lower rates provide relief, significant affordability challenges persist. Home prices remain elevated in many markets, and a substantial number of existing homeowners hold mortgages with rates far below current levels—creating what economists call the &#8220;lock-in effect&#8221; that discourages moving.



Hannah Jones, senior economic research analyst at Realtor.com, projects mortgage rates will hover in the low-6% range throughout 2026, potentially supporting &#8220;modestly improving home sales.&#8221; Yet she emphasizes that any recovery will likely be &#8220;gradual rather than rapid&#8221; given persistent affordability constraints.



The policy move represents an unconventional approach to economic stimulus, directly targeting housing market conditions through government-sponsored enterprise balance sheets. While the immediate effect on rates has been clear, longer-term implications for the housing market, federal housing finance policy, and the broader economy remain subjects of intense debate among economists and policy analysts.



For now, Americans looking to enter the housing market or refinance existing mortgages have a window of opportunity that hasn&#8217;t existed since rates began their historic climb in late 2022.

Mortgage Rates Drop to Three-Year Low Following Trump's $200 Billion Bond Purchase Plan

Economic Stimulus

Mortgage

Mortgage Bonds

Noble Capital Markets Research Morning Call

When virtually every metal on the commodities board flashes red-hot price signals simultaneously, savvy investors know to pay attention. Today's market presents exactly that scenario, with precious and industrial metals alike reaching or approaching all-time highs—a phenomenon that historically precedes significant economic turbulence.



Gold continues setting fresh records, trading around $4,650 per ounce today after gaining roughly 73% over the past year. But gold's ascent tells only part of the story. Silver has exploded to around $92 per ounce, marking an extraordinary 200% year-over-year surge. Platinum has climbed to approximately $2,411 per ounce, up 158% from last year, while palladium has nearly doubled, rising about 100% to trade near $1,907 per ounce.



The industrial metals complex mirrors this feverish activity. Copper smashed through $13,300 per metric ton today, marking a 38-40% year-over-year gain and setting new all-time highs. The surge reflects both AI-driven infrastructure demand and tariff-induced inventory stockpiling, with U.S. COMEX inventories ballooning from under 100,000 metric tons to over 500,000 metric tons in just one year.



When both safe-haven metals and industrial commodities rally simultaneously, it signals a dangerous market dynamic. Precious metals typically surge when investors flee traditional assets, seeking refuge from inflation, currency devaluation, or geopolitical instability. Industrial metals, conversely, usually rise on strong economic demand. Their concurrent ascent suggests investors are hedging against economic chaos while supply disruptions create artificial scarcity.



Base metal prices fall by around 30% on average during recessions, according to analysis from major financial institutions. The current recession risk for 2025 stands at 60%, with tariff-driven cuts to economic growth forecasts prompting analysts to turn bearish on near-term base metals prices. The mining sector itself appears to be pricing in recessionary conditions already.



The rally's drivers paint a troubling picture. Supply disruptions from mining accidents and labor strikes have constrained copper output globally. Federal Reserve independence concerns following a criminal investigation into Chair Jerome Powell have driven safe-haven demand. Meanwhile, geopolitical flashpoints from Venezuela to Iran add fuel to the fire. Central bank gold purchases and rate cut expectations signal policymakers' own concerns about economic stability.



History offers a stark lesson. Similar across-the-board metal rallies preceded the 2008 financial crisis and the early 1980s stagflation. When prices become untethered from fundamental demand and instead reflect fear, speculation, and monetary desperation, corrections inevitably follow—often accompanied by broader economic pain.



For small-cap investors, this environment demands defensive positioning. Companies with strong balance sheets, minimal commodity exposure, and recession-resistant business models deserve premium valuations. The metals market is flashing a warning sign that prudent investors ignore at their peril.

When virtually every metal on the commodities board flashes red-hot price signals simultaneously, savvy investors know to pay attention. Today&#8217;s market presents exactly that scenario, with precious and industrial metals alike reaching or approaching all-time highs—a phenomenon that historically precedes significant economic turbulence.



Gold continues setting fresh records, trading around $4,650 per ounce today after gaining roughly 73% over the past year. But gold&#8217;s ascent tells only part of the story. Silver has exploded to around $92 per ounce, marking an extraordinary 200% year-over-year surge. Platinum has climbed to approximately $2,411 per ounce, up 158% from last year, while palladium has nearly doubled, rising about 100% to trade near $1,907 per ounce.



The industrial metals complex mirrors this feverish activity. Copper smashed through $13,300 per metric ton today, marking a 38-40% year-over-year gain and setting new all-time highs. The surge reflects both AI-driven infrastructure demand and tariff-induced inventory stockpiling, with U.S. COMEX inventories ballooning from under 100,000 metric tons to over 500,000 metric tons in just one year.



When both safe-haven metals and industrial commodities rally simultaneously, it signals a dangerous market dynamic. Precious metals typically surge when investors flee traditional assets, seeking refuge from inflation, currency devaluation, or geopolitical instability. Industrial metals, conversely, usually rise on strong economic demand. Their concurrent ascent suggests investors are hedging against economic chaos while supply disruptions create artificial scarcity.



Base metal prices fall by around 30% on average during recessions, according to analysis from major financial institutions. The current recession risk for 2025 stands at 60%, with tariff-driven cuts to economic growth forecasts prompting analysts to turn bearish on near-term base metals prices. The mining sector itself appears to be pricing in recessionary conditions already.



The rally&#8217;s drivers paint a troubling picture. Supply disruptions from mining accidents and labor strikes have constrained copper output globally. Federal Reserve independence concerns following a criminal investigation into Chair Jerome Powell have driven safe-haven demand. Meanwhile, geopolitical flashpoints from Venezuela to Iran add fuel to the fire. Central bank gold purchases and rate cut expectations signal policymakers&#8217; own concerns about economic stability.



History offers a stark lesson. Similar across-the-board metal rallies preceded the 2008 financial crisis and the early 1980s stagflation. When prices become untethered from fundamental demand and instead reflect fear, speculation, and monetary desperation, corrections inevitably follow—often accompanied by broader economic pain.



For small-cap investors, this environment demands defensive positioning. Companies with strong balance sheets, minimal commodity exposure, and recession-resistant business models deserve premium valuations. The metals market is flashing a warning sign that prudent investors ignore at their peril.

Metals at Record Highs: A Warning Sign for the Economy?

Gold

metals

Platinum

Silver

U.S. tariff revenue declined sharply in December, offering fresh evidence that President Trump’s aggressive trade policies are reshaping global commerce and slowing the flow of goods into American ports. A new report from the U.S. Treasury released Tuesday showed that $27.89 billion in tariff revenue was collected in December, nearly $3 billion less than in November and more than 10% below the October peak.



The December figure caps off a historically lucrative year for tariff collections, with total revenue reaching $264.05 billion in 2025—an unprecedented annual haul. However, it also marks the second consecutive monthly decline after the Trump administration rolled back or adjusted key tariffs late last year. October saw the highest monthly intake at $31.35 billion, followed by $30.76 billion in November before the more pronounced drop in December.



The downturn in tariff revenue reflects broader shifts in U.S. trade flows. Commerce Department data released alongside the Treasury report showed the U.S. trade deficit narrowed to $29.4 billion in November, the lowest level since mid-2009. While the data was delayed due to last fall’s government shutdown, it underscores a clear trend: less trade activity involving the United States, driven largely by sweeping tariff measures.



Administration officials have framed the shrinking trade deficit as a major policy success. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent recently credited President Trump’s trade agenda for the improvement, noting that the deficit has fallen back to levels not seen since the aftermath of the global financial crisis. When Trump introduced his tariff regime earlier in the year, monthly customs revenues surged dramatically, rising from just $7.25 billion in February and climbing steadily through October.



Yet the recent step-down in revenue highlights the limits of tariffs as a long-term funding source. The Congressional Budget Office has already slashed its projected tariff receipts for the coming decade by roughly $1 trillion, suggesting that trade volumes are adjusting downward faster than policymakers initially anticipated. This has implications for Trump’s broader fiscal ambitions, many of which have leaned heavily on tariff income.



The president has repeatedly suggested that tariffs could fund a wide range of priorities, from tax cuts to infrastructure to national defense. Most recently, Trump argued that tariffs could support a proposed $500 billion annual increase in the U.S. military budget—a figure that exceeds twice the total tariff revenue collected in all of 2025.



Meanwhile, uncertainty continues to loom over global trade in 2026. The White House has issued new tariff threats, including a proposed 25% levy on goods from any country doing business with Iran. At the same time, a closely watched Supreme Court decision on the legality of Trump’s broad “blanket” tariffs could arrive as early as this week.



Trade data underscores the scale of the shift already underway. Shipping analytics firm Project44 reported that U.S. imports from China fell 28% in 2025, while U.S. exports to China dropped 38%, describing the change as one of the sharpest bilateral trade contractions in recent history. While shipping volumes appear to be stabilizing, they are doing so at a markedly lower level.



As the U.S. recalibrates its trade posture, the rest of the world is moving in a different direction. The European Union recently approved a landmark free-trade agreement with Mercosur nations in Latin America, creating one of the world’s largest trade blocs and highlighting a growing divergence in global trade strategies.

U.S. tariff revenue declined sharply in December, offering fresh evidence that President Trump’s aggressive trade policies are reshaping global commerce and slowing the flow of goods into American ports. A new report from the U.S. Treasury released Tuesday showed that $27.89 billion in tariff revenue was collected in December, nearly $3 billion less than in November and more than 10% below the October peak.



The December figure caps off a historically lucrative year for tariff collections, with total revenue reaching $264.05 billion in 2025—an unprecedented annual haul. However, it also marks the second consecutive monthly decline after the Trump administration rolled back or adjusted key tariffs late last year. October saw the highest monthly intake at $31.35 billion, followed by $30.76 billion in November before the more pronounced drop in December.



The downturn in tariff revenue reflects broader shifts in U.S. trade flows. Commerce Department data released alongside the Treasury report showed the U.S. trade deficit narrowed to $29.4 billion in November, the lowest level since mid-2009. While the data was delayed due to last fall’s government shutdown, it underscores a clear trend: less trade activity involving the United States, driven largely by sweeping tariff measures.



Administration officials have framed the shrinking trade deficit as a major policy success. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent recently credited President Trump’s trade agenda for the improvement, noting that the deficit has fallen back to levels not seen since the aftermath of the global financial crisis. When Trump introduced his tariff regime earlier in the year, monthly customs revenues surged dramatically, rising from just $7.25 billion in February and climbing steadily through October.



Yet the recent step-down in revenue highlights the limits of tariffs as a long-term funding source. The Congressional Budget Office has already slashed its projected tariff receipts for the coming decade by roughly $1 trillion, suggesting that trade volumes are adjusting downward faster than policymakers initially anticipated. This has implications for Trump’s broader fiscal ambitions, many of which have leaned heavily on tariff income.



The president has repeatedly suggested that tariffs could fund a wide range of priorities, from tax cuts to infrastructure to national defense. Most recently, Trump argued that tariffs could support a proposed $500 billion annual increase in the U.S. military budget—a figure that exceeds twice the total tariff revenue collected in all of 2025.



Meanwhile, uncertainty continues to loom over global trade in 2026. The White House has issued new tariff threats, including a proposed 25% levy on goods from any country doing business with Iran. At the same time, a closely watched Supreme Court decision on the legality of Trump’s broad “blanket” tariffs could arrive as early as this week.



Trade data underscores the scale of the shift already underway. Shipping analytics firm Project44 reported that U.S. imports from China fell 28% in 2025, while U.S. exports to China dropped 38%, describing the change as one of the sharpest bilateral trade contractions in recent history. While shipping volumes appear to be stabilizing, they are doing so at a markedly lower level.



As the U.S. recalibrates its trade posture, the rest of the world is moving in a different direction. The European Union recently approved a landmark free-trade agreement with Mercosur nations in Latin America, creating one of the world’s largest trade blocs and highlighting a growing divergence in global trade strategies.

U.S. Tariff Revenue Falls Sharply in December as Trade Volumes Continue to Reset

Oil markets are experiencing their sharpest rally in months as geopolitical tensions surrounding Iran send shockwaves through global energy trading. Both Brent crude and West Texas Intermediate have climbed more than 10% over the past week, with prices reaching levels not seen since October.



The rally comes as widespread protests continue to rock Iran, prompting President Trump to warn that the country's ruling regime would face serious consequences. This marks a significant shift in market attention from Venezuela, where oil shipments have recently resumed, back to Iran—what energy experts are calling the nerve center of global oil markets.



Iran's position in the global oil landscape is uniquely influential for two critical reasons. First, the country produces over 3 million barrels daily and exports approximately 1.5 million barrels per day. Beyond current production, Iran sits atop more than 200 billion barrels of proven reserves, ranking third globally behind only Venezuela and Saudi Arabia. Unlike Venezuelan crude, Iran's lighter, medium-weight oil is easier to refine and more desirable for buyers.



Second, and perhaps more critically, Iran largely controls the Strait of Hormuz—a narrow waterway that serves as one of the world's most vital oil chokepoints. Roughly 20 million barrels per day, representing about 25% of global seaborne petroleum trade, flows through this strategic passage. Any closure or disruption would immediately send prices soaring.



Historical precedent underscores this vulnerability. When Israeli forces struck Iranian military and nuclear sites last June, Brent crude jumped 7% in a single day despite the Strait never actually closing.



Energy analysts warn that sustained civil unrest could disrupt Iran's oil infrastructure. Widespread upheaval might prevent skilled workers from reaching production and export facilities, while basic services like electricity could become unreliable. Experts suggest at least limited production interruptions are likely if tensions continue escalating.



A worst-case scenario would mirror the 1979 Iranian Revolution, when political upheaval cut the country's oil production nearly in half—from over 5.7 million barrels per day to just 3.2 million barrels. While analysts consider a complete production collapse unlikely, even partial disruptions would significantly impact global supplies.



The Trump administration has intensified pressure on Tehran, announcing immediate 25% tariffs on any country conducting business with Iran. The president has also signaled support for protesters facing violent crackdowns that have reportedly killed thousands amid internet blackouts.



China, which purchases more than 80% of Iranian crude, would feel immediate effects from any export disruptions. Chinese refiners might shift demand toward Russian oil or tap domestic reserves that Beijing has been stockpiling as geopolitical insurance.



Despite the price spike, some analysts urge caution. The global oil market currently faces a supply glut of approximately 3.6 million barrels per day, which could absorb moderate disruptions. However, trading activity tells a different story—Monday saw record volume in Brent crude call options as traders hedge against sudden price spikes, while volatility indicators have reached their highest levels since last summer's strikes.



For now, markets remain on edge, closely watching whether Iran's internal turmoil will translate into the sustained supply disruption that could send prices substantially higher.

Oil markets are experiencing their sharpest rally in months as geopolitical tensions surrounding Iran send shockwaves through global energy trading. Both Brent crude and West Texas Intermediate have climbed more than 10% over the past week, with prices reaching levels not seen since October.



The rally comes as widespread protests continue to rock Iran, prompting President Trump to warn that the country&#8217;s ruling regime would face serious consequences. This marks a significant shift in market attention from Venezuela, where oil shipments have recently resumed, back to Iran—what energy experts are calling the nerve center of global oil markets.



Iran&#8217;s position in the global oil landscape is uniquely influential for two critical reasons. First, the country produces over 3 million barrels daily and exports approximately 1.5 million barrels per day. Beyond current production, Iran sits atop more than 200 billion barrels of proven reserves, ranking third globally behind only Venezuela and Saudi Arabia. Unlike Venezuelan crude, Iran&#8217;s lighter, medium-weight oil is easier to refine and more desirable for buyers.



Second, and perhaps more critically, Iran largely controls the Strait of Hormuz—a narrow waterway that serves as one of the world&#8217;s most vital oil chokepoints. Roughly 20 million barrels per day, representing about 25% of global seaborne petroleum trade, flows through this strategic passage. Any closure or disruption would immediately send prices soaring.



Historical precedent underscores this vulnerability. When Israeli forces struck Iranian military and nuclear sites last June, Brent crude jumped 7% in a single day despite the Strait never actually closing.



Energy analysts warn that sustained civil unrest could disrupt Iran&#8217;s oil infrastructure. Widespread upheaval might prevent skilled workers from reaching production and export facilities, while basic services like electricity could become unreliable. Experts suggest at least limited production interruptions are likely if tensions continue escalating.



A worst-case scenario would mirror the 1979 Iranian Revolution, when political upheaval cut the country&#8217;s oil production nearly in half—from over 5.7 million barrels per day to just 3.2 million barrels. While analysts consider a complete production collapse unlikely, even partial disruptions would significantly impact global supplies.



The Trump administration has intensified pressure on Tehran, announcing immediate 25% tariffs on any country conducting business with Iran. The president has also signaled support for protesters facing violent crackdowns that have reportedly killed thousands amid internet blackouts.



China, which purchases more than 80% of Iranian crude, would feel immediate effects from any export disruptions. Chinese refiners might shift demand toward Russian oil or tap domestic reserves that Beijing has been stockpiling as geopolitical insurance.



Despite the price spike, some analysts urge caution. The global oil market currently faces a supply glut of approximately 3.6 million barrels per day, which could absorb moderate disruptions. However, trading activity tells a different story—Monday saw record volume in Brent crude call options as traders hedge against sudden price spikes, while volatility indicators have reached their highest levels since last summer&#8217;s strikes.



For now, markets remain on edge, closely watching whether Iran&#8217;s internal turmoil will translate into the sustained supply disruption that could send prices substantially higher.

Oil Prices Surge to Two-Month High as Iran Tensions Threaten Global Energy Markets

Crude Oil

Geopolitical Tensions

Iran

U.S. inflation showed further signs of cooling in December, offering fresh evidence that price pressures across the economy are continuing to moderate as the year comes to a close. According to the latest Consumer Price Index (CPI) report released Tuesday by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, core consumer prices rose at their slowest annual pace since March 2021, reinforcing expectations that the Federal Reserve will keep interest rates steady in the near term.



On a core basis—excluding the volatile food and energy categories—prices increased 0.2% from November and rose 2.6% compared with a year earlier. That annual reading matched November’s figure and marked the weakest pace of core inflation in nearly five years. Headline inflation, which includes all categories, rose 0.3% month over month and 2.7% year over year, in line with economists’ expectations.



While inflation remains above the Federal Reserve’s long-term 2% target, the steady downward trend over the past year has eased concerns that elevated prices could derail economic growth. Policymakers have increasingly signaled that inflation now poses less of a threat than a potential slowdown in the labor market, a view supported by recent economic data.



Economists pointed to signs that underlying inflation pressures are genuinely cooling. Stephen Brown, an economist at Capital Economics, noted that December’s softer core reading came despite some price rebounds following unusually weak data in October and November. This, he said, suggests that inflation momentum has meaningfully slowed rather than temporarily paused.



The CPI report follows last week’s December jobs data, which showed the unemployment rate pulling back from a four-year high. Together, the inflation and labor market reports have strengthened investor confidence that the Federal Reserve will leave interest rates unchanged at its January 27–28 policy meeting. Futures market data from CME Group now indicate a roughly 95% probability that rates will remain steady.



A closer look at the report revealed mixed price trends for households. Food inflation remained a notable pressure point, with food prices rising 0.7% in December, outpacing overall inflation. Five of the six major grocery store food categories posted monthly increases, including grains, dairy, fruits, and beverages. Only meat prices declined, slipping 0.2% during the month.



Offsetting some of those pressures were declines in several key core categories. Used car and truck prices fell 1.7% in December, while airline fares dropped 0.5%. Transportation services overall also declined by 0.5%, helping keep core inflation contained.



Energy prices provided additional relief. Gasoline prices plunged 5.3% in December amid falling oil prices, contributing to a 2% monthly decline in the energy index. These declines helped temper headline inflation despite higher food costs.



Nationwide chief economist Kathy Bostjancic described the report as “very encouraging,” adding that it supports expectations that lingering tariff-related pressures on goods prices will fade in 2026. As inflation continues to cool and economic growth remains resilient, markets and policymakers alike appear increasingly confident that the worst of the inflation surge is firmly in the past.

U.S. inflation showed further signs of cooling in December, offering fresh evidence that price pressures across the economy are continuing to moderate as the year comes to a close. According to the latest Consumer Price Index (CPI) report released Tuesday by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, core consumer prices rose at their slowest annual pace since March 2021, reinforcing expectations that the Federal Reserve will keep interest rates steady in the near term.



On a core basis—excluding the volatile food and energy categories—prices increased 0.2% from November and rose 2.6% compared with a year earlier. That annual reading matched November’s figure and marked the weakest pace of core inflation in nearly five years. Headline inflation, which includes all categories, rose 0.3% month over month and 2.7% year over year, in line with economists’ expectations.



While inflation remains above the Federal Reserve’s long-term 2% target, the steady downward trend over the past year has eased concerns that elevated prices could derail economic growth. Policymakers have increasingly signaled that inflation now poses less of a threat than a potential slowdown in the labor market, a view supported by recent economic data.



Economists pointed to signs that underlying inflation pressures are genuinely cooling. Stephen Brown, an economist at Capital Economics, noted that December’s softer core reading came despite some price rebounds following unusually weak data in October and November. This, he said, suggests that inflation momentum has meaningfully slowed rather than temporarily paused.



The CPI report follows last week’s December jobs data, which showed the unemployment rate pulling back from a four-year high. Together, the inflation and labor market reports have strengthened investor confidence that the Federal Reserve will leave interest rates unchanged at its January 27–28 policy meeting. Futures market data from CME Group now indicate a roughly 95% probability that rates will remain steady.



A closer look at the report revealed mixed price trends for households. Food inflation remained a notable pressure point, with food prices rising 0.7% in December, outpacing overall inflation. Five of the six major grocery store food categories posted monthly increases, including grains, dairy, fruits, and beverages. Only meat prices declined, slipping 0.2% during the month.



Offsetting some of those pressures were declines in several key core categories. Used car and truck prices fell 1.7% in December, while airline fares dropped 0.5%. Transportation services overall also declined by 0.5%, helping keep core inflation contained.



Energy prices provided additional relief. Gasoline prices plunged 5.3% in December amid falling oil prices, contributing to a 2% monthly decline in the energy index. These declines helped temper headline inflation despite higher food costs.



Nationwide chief economist Kathy Bostjancic described the report as “very encouraging,” adding that it supports expectations that lingering tariff-related pressures on goods prices will fade in 2026. As inflation continues to cool and economic growth remains resilient, markets and policymakers alike appear increasingly confident that the worst of the inflation surge is firmly in the past.

U.S. Inflation Cools in December as Core Prices Rise at Slowest Pace Since 2021

Economy

Inflation

Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell revealed Sunday that the U.S. Department of Justice has issued grand jury subpoenas to the Federal Reserve, opening a case that could potentially lead to a criminal indictment against him. The development marks a dramatic escalation in tensions between the central bank and the Trump administration, with Powell characterizing the move as part of an ongoing pressure campaign over interest rate policy.



According to Powell, the subpoenas are tied to his testimony before the U.S. Senate Banking Committee in June, where he addressed scrutiny surrounding cost overruns in the Federal Reserve’s headquarters renovation project. Powell has consistently disputed claims that the renovation involved luxury features or legal violations, stating that public reports and political accusations have been inaccurate and misleading.



In a recorded statement released Sunday night, Powell suggested the DOJ’s action goes beyond a factual dispute over his testimony. Instead, he framed the case as a response to the Federal Reserve’s refusal to align interest rate decisions with political demands.



“The threat of criminal charges is a consequence of the Federal Reserve setting interest rates based on our best assessment of what will serve the public,” Powell said, “rather than following the preferences of the President.”



Powell emphasized that the issue at stake is whether monetary policy will continue to be guided by economic data and evidence, or whether it will be shaped by political pressure and intimidation. He defended his tenure at the Fed, noting that he has served under both Democratic and Republican administrations and has consistently followed the Fed’s congressional mandate to promote maximum employment and stable prices.



The DOJ subpoenas come after months of increasingly public conflict between Powell and President Trump. The president has repeatedly criticized the Fed for not cutting interest rates aggressively enough, despite the central bank beginning to ease policy in late 2025. After holding rates steady for much of the year, the Fed implemented three quarter-point rate cuts in September, October, and December, bringing the benchmark rate to a range of 3.5% to 3.75%.



The dispute has also centered on the Federal Reserve’s headquarters renovation in Washington, D.C. Trump has accused Powell of mismanagement and suggested the project’s cost ballooned to more than $3 billion — a figure Powell disputes. In July, Trump made a rare visit to the Fed’s headquarters, publicly clashing with Powell over the scope and cost of the renovations.



Powell testified to lawmakers that there were no luxury additions such as special elevators, rooftop gardens, or water features, countering allegations from administration officials that the project was “ostentatious” or unlawful.



President Trump told NBC News Sunday night that he was unaware of the DOJ probe. However, he reiterated criticism of Powell’s leadership, arguing that interest rates remain too high. When asked whether the investigation was intended to pressure the Fed, Trump denied the suggestion.



Market analysts warn that the case could have broader implications. Krishna Guha of Evercore ISI described the situation as an unprecedented confrontation, noting that how policymakers, investors, and Congress respond could determine whether Federal Reserve independence remains firmly protected.



The Justice Department has not publicly commented on the subpoenas. For now, Powell says he intends to continue leading the central bank as confirmed by the Senate, warning that the use of criminal investigations in monetary policy disputes could undermine institutional credibility.



“Public service sometimes requires standing firm in the face of threats,” Powell said, as the case places the Fed at the center of a historic legal and political clash.

Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell revealed Sunday that the U.S. Department of Justice has issued grand jury subpoenas to the Federal Reserve, opening a case that could potentially lead to a criminal indictment against him. The development marks a dramatic escalation in tensions between the central bank and the Trump administration, with Powell characterizing the move as part of an ongoing pressure campaign over interest rate policy.



According to Powell, the subpoenas are tied to his testimony before the U.S. Senate Banking Committee in June, where he addressed scrutiny surrounding cost overruns in the Federal Reserve’s headquarters renovation project. Powell has consistently disputed claims that the renovation involved luxury features or legal violations, stating that public reports and political accusations have been inaccurate and misleading.



In a recorded statement released Sunday night, Powell suggested the DOJ’s action goes beyond a factual dispute over his testimony. Instead, he framed the case as a response to the Federal Reserve’s refusal to align interest rate decisions with political demands.



“The threat of criminal charges is a consequence of the Federal Reserve setting interest rates based on our best assessment of what will serve the public,” Powell said, “rather than following the preferences of the President.”



Powell emphasized that the issue at stake is whether monetary policy will continue to be guided by economic data and evidence, or whether it will be shaped by political pressure and intimidation. He defended his tenure at the Fed, noting that he has served under both Democratic and Republican administrations and has consistently followed the Fed’s congressional mandate to promote maximum employment and stable prices.



The DOJ subpoenas come after months of increasingly public conflict between Powell and President Trump. The president has repeatedly criticized the Fed for not cutting interest rates aggressively enough, despite the central bank beginning to ease policy in late 2025. After holding rates steady for much of the year, the Fed implemented three quarter-point rate cuts in September, October, and December, bringing the benchmark rate to a range of 3.5% to 3.75%.



The dispute has also centered on the Federal Reserve’s headquarters renovation in Washington, D.C. Trump has accused Powell of mismanagement and suggested the project’s cost ballooned to more than $3 billion — a figure Powell disputes. In July, Trump made a rare visit to the Fed’s headquarters, publicly clashing with Powell over the scope and cost of the renovations.



Powell testified to lawmakers that there were no luxury additions such as special elevators, rooftop gardens, or water features, countering allegations from administration officials that the project was “ostentatious” or unlawful.



President Trump told NBC News Sunday night that he was unaware of the DOJ probe. However, he reiterated criticism of Powell’s leadership, arguing that interest rates remain too high. When asked whether the investigation was intended to pressure the Fed, Trump denied the suggestion.



Market analysts warn that the case could have broader implications. Krishna Guha of Evercore ISI described the situation as an unprecedented confrontation, noting that how policymakers, investors, and Congress respond could determine whether Federal Reserve independence remains firmly protected.



The Justice Department has not publicly commented on the subpoenas. For now, Powell says he intends to continue leading the central bank as confirmed by the Senate, warning that the use of criminal investigations in monetary policy disputes could undermine institutional credibility.



“Public service sometimes requires standing firm in the face of threats,” Powell said, as the case places the Fed at the center of a historic legal and political clash.

DOJ Opens Case Against Fed Chair Powell

Donald Trump

Fed Chair

Jerome Powell

Allegiant Air and Sun Country Airlines have announced a definitive merger agreement that will combine two of the most established leisure-focused carriers in the United States, creating a larger, more competitive airline designed to thrive in a demand-driven travel market. Under the terms of the deal, Allegiant will acquire Sun Country in a cash-and-stock transaction valuing Sun Country at approximately $1.5 billion, including net debt.



Sun Country shareholders will receive $4.10 in cash and 0.1557 shares of Allegiant stock for each share they own, representing a nearly 20% premium over Sun Country’s recent trading price. Upon completion, Allegiant shareholders will own roughly 67% of the combined company, with Sun Country shareholders holding the remaining 33%. The transaction is expected to close in the second half of 2026, subject to regulatory and shareholder approvals.



The merger brings together two airlines with similar operating philosophies centered on flexibility, cost discipline, and leisure demand. Together, the combined airline will serve approximately 22 million passengers annually, operate nearly 195 aircraft, and offer more than 650 routes across nearly 175 cities. The companies’ networks are highly complementary, with Allegiant focused on small and mid-sized markets and Sun Country maintaining a stronger presence in larger metropolitan areas, particularly Minneapolis–St. Paul.



A major strategic benefit of the deal is expanded access to international leisure destinations. Sun Country’s existing routes to Mexico, Central America, Canada, and the Caribbean will significantly broaden Allegiant’s reach beyond domestic markets, allowing travelers from underserved U.S. cities to reach international vacation destinations more easily and affordably.



Financially, the companies expect meaningful upside. Allegiant projects the merger will generate approximately $140 million in annual synergies by the third year following closing, driven by network optimization, fleet efficiencies, and scale benefits. The transaction is expected to be accretive to earnings per share in the first year after closing, while maintaining a conservative balance sheet with net adjusted debt below three times EBITDAR.



Diversification is another key advantage of the combination. In addition to scheduled passenger service, Sun Country operates long-term charter and cargo businesses, including a multi-year agreement with Amazon Prime Air. When combined with Allegiant’s existing charter operations, the merged airline will benefit from more stable, year-round revenue streams that help offset the seasonality of leisure travel.



Customers are also expected to see improvements through a larger and more valuable loyalty program. The combined frequent flyer base will exceed 23 million members, offering expanded earning opportunities, enhanced rewards, and greater flexibility across a broader route network.



Leadership of the combined company will remain with Allegiant, which will continue as the publicly traded parent. Allegiant CEO Gregory C. Anderson will lead the merged airline, while Sun Country CEO Jude Bricker will join the board and serve as an advisor during the integration process. Allegiant will remain headquartered in Las Vegas, with a continued significant presence in Minneapolis–St. Paul.



Overall, the Allegiant–Sun Country merger represents a strategic bet on leisure travel demand, operational flexibility, and diversified revenue, positioning the combined airline to compete more effectively while delivering long-term value to shareholders, employees, and travelers alike.

Allegiant Air and Sun Country Airlines have announced a definitive merger agreement that will combine two of the most established leisure-focused carriers in the United States, creating a larger, more competitive airline designed to thrive in a demand-driven travel market. Under the terms of the deal, Allegiant will acquire Sun Country in a cash-and-stock transaction valuing Sun Country at approximately $1.5 billion, including net debt.



Sun Country shareholders will receive $4.10 in cash and 0.1557 shares of Allegiant stock for each share they own, representing a nearly 20% premium over Sun Country’s recent trading price. Upon completion, Allegiant shareholders will own roughly 67% of the combined company, with Sun Country shareholders holding the remaining 33%. The transaction is expected to close in the second half of 2026, subject to regulatory and shareholder approvals.



The merger brings together two airlines with similar operating philosophies centered on flexibility, cost discipline, and leisure demand. Together, the combined airline will serve approximately 22 million passengers annually, operate nearly 195 aircraft, and offer more than 650 routes across nearly 175 cities. The companies’ networks are highly complementary, with Allegiant focused on small and mid-sized markets and Sun Country maintaining a stronger presence in larger metropolitan areas, particularly Minneapolis–St. Paul.



A major strategic benefit of the deal is expanded access to international leisure destinations. Sun Country’s existing routes to Mexico, Central America, Canada, and the Caribbean will significantly broaden Allegiant’s reach beyond domestic markets, allowing travelers from underserved U.S. cities to reach international vacation destinations more easily and affordably.



Financially, the companies expect meaningful upside. Allegiant projects the merger will generate approximately $140 million in annual synergies by the third year following closing, driven by network optimization, fleet efficiencies, and scale benefits. The transaction is expected to be accretive to earnings per share in the first year after closing, while maintaining a conservative balance sheet with net adjusted debt below three times EBITDAR.



Diversification is another key advantage of the combination. In addition to scheduled passenger service, Sun Country operates long-term charter and cargo businesses, including a multi-year agreement with Amazon Prime Air. When combined with Allegiant’s existing charter operations, the merged airline will benefit from more stable, year-round revenue streams that help offset the seasonality of leisure travel.



Customers are also expected to see improvements through a larger and more valuable loyalty program. The combined frequent flyer base will exceed 23 million members, offering expanded earning opportunities, enhanced rewards, and greater flexibility across a broader route network.



Leadership of the combined company will remain with Allegiant, which will continue as the publicly traded parent. Allegiant CEO Gregory C. Anderson will lead the merged airline, while Sun Country CEO Jude Bricker will join the board and serve as an advisor during the integration process. Allegiant will remain headquartered in Las Vegas, with a continued significant presence in Minneapolis–St. Paul.



Overall, the Allegiant–Sun Country merger represents a strategic bet on leisure travel demand, operational flexibility, and diversified revenue, positioning the combined airline to compete more effectively while delivering long-term value to shareholders, employees, and travelers alike.

Allegiant to Acquire Sun Country, Forming a Major U.S. Leisure Airline Powerhouse

Airlines

Allegiant

Low-Cost Airlines

Sun Country

Travel

The final U.S. jobs report of 2025 delivered a sobering message: the labor market has slowed to a crawl. With just 50,000 jobs added in December, the year closed with the weakest pace of hiring outside of a recession in more than two decades. For investors—particularly those focused on small-cap stocks—this shift carries important implications as the economy enters 2026.



Total payroll growth for 2025 reached only 584,000 jobs, a dramatic fall from the roughly 2 million jobs added in 2024. Monthly gains averaged fewer than 50,000 positions, a level economists say is consistent with stagnation rather than expansion. While the unemployment rate dipped modestly to 4.4%, the decline was driven more by a shrinking labor force than by robust hiring.



Digging deeper, the data reveals a fragile employment landscape. Job creation was heavily concentrated in healthcare and social assistance, which together accounted for the majority of gains. Outside of those sectors, many industries experienced flat or negative hiring trends. Economists warn that future data revisions could show that overall employment actually contracted during parts of the year.



This environment has produced what many describe as a “no-hire, no-fire” economy. Companies are reluctant to lay off workers, but equally hesitant to expand payrolls amid higher borrowing costs, slower consumer demand, and lingering uncertainty around policy and global growth. For workers, this has translated into longer job searches and declining confidence. The share of unemployed individuals out of work for more than six months has risen sharply, signaling deeper structural weakness.



For investors, especially in the small-cap space, these conditions cut both ways. Slower job growth tends to pressure consumer spending, which can weigh on revenue for domestically focused companies. At the same time, a cooling labor market strengthens the case for interest rate relief later in 2026. If the Federal Reserve responds to weakening employment trends with rate cuts, smaller companies—often more sensitive to financing costs—could benefit disproportionately.



There are also early signs that the slowdown may be stabilizing. Layoff announcements declined in December, and private payroll data suggests hiring may be finding a floor. Some economists believe the worst of the labor market deceleration could already be behind us, setting the stage for a gradual recovery rather than a sharp downturn.



For small-cap investors, selectivity will be key. Businesses with strong balance sheets, pricing power, and exposure to resilient sectors may outperform if growth remains muted. Meanwhile, any meaningful improvement in hiring or labor participation could act as a catalyst for a broader re-rating across the small-cap universe.



As 2026 unfolds, the jobs market will remain a critical signal to watch. Whether this slowdown proves to be a pause—or a warning—will shape market sentiment, monetary policy, and investment opportunity in the months ahead.

The final U.S. jobs report of 2025 delivered a sobering message: the labor market has slowed to a crawl. With just 50,000 jobs added in December, the year closed with the weakest pace of hiring outside of a recession in more than two decades. For investors—particularly those focused on small-cap stocks—this shift carries important implications as the economy enters 2026.



Total payroll growth for 2025 reached only 584,000 jobs, a dramatic fall from the roughly 2 million jobs added in 2024. Monthly gains averaged fewer than 50,000 positions, a level economists say is consistent with stagnation rather than expansion. While the unemployment rate dipped modestly to 4.4%, the decline was driven more by a shrinking labor force than by robust hiring.



Digging deeper, the data reveals a fragile employment landscape. Job creation was heavily concentrated in healthcare and social assistance, which together accounted for the majority of gains. Outside of those sectors, many industries experienced flat or negative hiring trends. Economists warn that future data revisions could show that overall employment actually contracted during parts of the year.



This environment has produced what many describe as a “no-hire, no-fire” economy. Companies are reluctant to lay off workers, but equally hesitant to expand payrolls amid higher borrowing costs, slower consumer demand, and lingering uncertainty around policy and global growth. For workers, this has translated into longer job searches and declining confidence. The share of unemployed individuals out of work for more than six months has risen sharply, signaling deeper structural weakness.



For investors, especially in the small-cap space, these conditions cut both ways. Slower job growth tends to pressure consumer spending, which can weigh on revenue for domestically focused companies. At the same time, a cooling labor market strengthens the case for interest rate relief later in 2026. If the Federal Reserve responds to weakening employment trends with rate cuts, smaller companies—often more sensitive to financing costs—could benefit disproportionately.



There are also early signs that the slowdown may be stabilizing. Layoff announcements declined in December, and private payroll data suggests hiring may be finding a floor. Some economists believe the worst of the labor market deceleration could already be behind us, setting the stage for a gradual recovery rather than a sharp downturn.



For small-cap investors, selectivity will be key. Businesses with strong balance sheets, pricing power, and exposure to resilient sectors may outperform if growth remains muted. Meanwhile, any meaningful improvement in hiring or labor participation could act as a catalyst for a broader re-rating across the small-cap universe.



As 2026 unfolds, the jobs market will remain a critical signal to watch. Whether this slowdown proves to be a pause—or a warning—will shape market sentiment, monetary policy, and investment opportunity in the months ahead.

America’s Hiring Stall: What the Weak Jobs Market Means for Investors in 2026

Jobs

Labor Market

Unemployment

The artificial intelligence boom is no longer just about software models and chips—it’s increasingly about power, land, and infrastructure. That reality came into sharp focus this week as OpenAI and SoftBank jointly committed $1 billion to SB Energy, a fast-growing energy and data center infrastructure company positioned at the center of America’s AI buildout.



Under the deal, OpenAI and SoftBank will each invest $500 million to support SB Energy’s expansion as a large-scale developer and operator of data centers. As part of the partnership, SB Energy has been selected to build and operate OpenAI’s 1.2-gigawatt data center in Milam County, Texas, a facility large enough to power hundreds of thousands of homes. The investment highlights a critical shift: for AI leaders, securing reliable energy has become as strategic as securing advanced chips.



AI workloads are extraordinarily power-hungry. Training and running large language models requires enormous computing capacity, which in turn drives unprecedented electricity demand. As a result, hyperscalers and AI developers are now racing to lock down long-term energy sources and infrastructure partners to avoid future bottlenecks. In this environment, companies that can deliver power at scale are emerging as essential enablers of the AI economy.



SB Energy represents a hybrid model well-suited for this moment. Originally founded as a renewable energy and storage developer and long backed by SoftBank, the company has expanded aggressively into data center development, ownership, and operations. This dual exposure to both energy production and digital infrastructure positions SB Energy as a critical middle layer between power generation and AI compute demand.



The investment also ties directly into OpenAI’s Stargate initiative, a massive joint effort with partners including SoftBank and Oracle to invest up to $500 billion in U.S. AI infrastructure over the next four years. Stargate’s ambition underscores how central physical infrastructure has become to sustaining AI growth—and why capital is flowing into companies that can execute at scale.



From an investor’s perspective, this trend carries important implications. While mega-cap tech companies dominate AI headlines, much of the real opportunity may lie one layer below, in infrastructure providers, energy developers, and specialized operators that enable AI expansion. These businesses often generate long-term contracted revenue and may benefit from structural demand regardless of short-term swings in AI sentiment.



However, the rapid interconnection between AI firms, financiers, and infrastructure developers also introduces risk. Heavy capital commitments assume that AI demand will continue to rise at an aggressive pace. If adoption slows or efficiency gains reduce power needs, some projects could face pressure. Investors should therefore favor companies with diversified customers, strong balance sheets, and assets that retain value beyond AI-specific use cases.



Ultimately, the OpenAI–SoftBank investment in SB Energy signals a broader shift: AI is becoming an infrastructure-driven industry. For investors willing to look beyond the obvious names, the companies powering the AI revolution—literally—may offer some of the most compelling opportunities in the years ahead.

The artificial intelligence boom is no longer just about software models and chips—it’s increasingly about power, land, and infrastructure. That reality came into sharp focus this week as OpenAI and SoftBank jointly committed $1 billion to SB Energy, a fast-growing energy and data center infrastructure company positioned at the center of America’s AI buildout.



Under the deal, OpenAI and SoftBank will each invest $500 million to support SB Energy’s expansion as a large-scale developer and operator of data centers. As part of the partnership, SB Energy has been selected to build and operate OpenAI’s 1.2-gigawatt data center in Milam County, Texas, a facility large enough to power hundreds of thousands of homes. The investment highlights a critical shift: for AI leaders, securing reliable energy has become as strategic as securing advanced chips.



AI workloads are extraordinarily power-hungry. Training and running large language models requires enormous computing capacity, which in turn drives unprecedented electricity demand. As a result, hyperscalers and AI developers are now racing to lock down long-term energy sources and infrastructure partners to avoid future bottlenecks. In this environment, companies that can deliver power at scale are emerging as essential enablers of the AI economy.



SB Energy represents a hybrid model well-suited for this moment. Originally founded as a renewable energy and storage developer and long backed by SoftBank, the company has expanded aggressively into data center development, ownership, and operations. This dual exposure to both energy production and digital infrastructure positions SB Energy as a critical middle layer between power generation and AI compute demand.



The investment also ties directly into OpenAI’s Stargate initiative, a massive joint effort with partners including SoftBank and Oracle to invest up to $500 billion in U.S. AI infrastructure over the next four years. Stargate’s ambition underscores how central physical infrastructure has become to sustaining AI growth—and why capital is flowing into companies that can execute at scale.



From an investor’s perspective, this trend carries important implications. While mega-cap tech companies dominate AI headlines, much of the real opportunity may lie one layer below, in infrastructure providers, energy developers, and specialized operators that enable AI expansion. These businesses often generate long-term contracted revenue and may benefit from structural demand regardless of short-term swings in AI sentiment.



However, the rapid interconnection between AI firms, financiers, and infrastructure developers also introduces risk. Heavy capital commitments assume that AI demand will continue to rise at an aggressive pace. If adoption slows or efficiency gains reduce power needs, some projects could face pressure. Investors should therefore favor companies with diversified customers, strong balance sheets, and assets that retain value beyond AI-specific use cases.



Ultimately, the OpenAI–SoftBank investment in SB Energy signals a broader shift: AI is becoming an infrastructure-driven industry. For investors willing to look beyond the obvious names, the companies powering the AI revolution—literally—may offer some of the most compelling opportunities in the years ahead.

The Real AI Arms Race: Why Power and Data Centers Are Becoming the Next Big Investment Theme

Data centers

Energy

Open AI

Footer menu

Contact Me

Feedback

Test form

Event Registration

The NobleCon20 VIP Giveaway

Noble Announcement | 2H 2025 Events

Main menu

The NobleCon20 VIP Giveaway – Terms and Conditions
1. Organizer The NobleCon20 VIP Giveaway (“Contest”) is organized by Noble Financial Group and Channelchek (“Organizers”).
2. Eligibility The Contest is open to legal residents of the United States who are 18 years of age or older at the time of entry. Employees of the Organizers, their affiliates, subsidiaries, advertising and promotion agencies, and immediate family members are not eligible to participate.
3. Contest Period The Contest begins on [Start Date] and ends on October 31, 2024, at 11:59 PM ET. Entries submitted after the Contest Period will not be considered.
4. How to Enter To enter the Contest:
<ul>
<li>You must be a registered and verified Channelchek member.</li>
<li>You must complete the Contest entry form available at [Entry Form URL].</li>
</ul>
5. Prize The prize package includes:
<ul>
<li>Round-trip economy airfare for two (2) to South Florida to attend NobleCon20.</li>
<li>Two (2) hotel rooms for the duration of NobleCon20.</li>
<li>Two (2) tickets to NobleCon20, including access to all official NobleCon20 events.</li>
<li>Two (2) VIP meet-and-greet upgrades to the headline event featuring three (3) of the Sharks from ABC’s Shark Tank.</li>
</ul>
There will be one (1) winner chosen. All travel and accommodations are subject to availability and must be arranged through the Organizers. No substitution, transfer, or cash equivalent of prizes is permitted.
6. Winner Selection The winner will be selected on November 1, 2024. The winner will be notified via email using the contact information provided during entry. If the winner does not respond within seven (7) days of the notification, the Organizers reserve the right to select an alternate winner.
7. General Conditions
<ul>
<li>No purchase is necessary to enter or win.</li>
<li>The Contest is void where prohibited by law.</li>
<li>The prize does not include a presentation slot at NobleCon20.</li>
<li>By participating, entrants agree to be bound by these Terms and Conditions and the decisions of the Organizers, which are final and binding in all respects.</li>
<li>The Organizers reserve the right to disqualify any entry that is incomplete, misdirected, or in violation of these Terms and Conditions.</li>
</ul>
8. Privacy By entering the Contest, you agree that your personal information may be used by the Organizers in accordance with their privacy policies.
9. Limitation of Liability The Organizers are not responsible for any incorrect or inaccurate information, technical failures, or unauthorized intervention in the Contest. The Organizers are not liable for any injury or damage to persons or property resulting from participation in the Contest or acceptance or use of any prize.
10. Contact Information For questions or further information about the Contest, please contact the Organizers at contact@channelchek.com.

NobleCon20 VIP Contest Terms

NobleCon20 VIP Giveaway

Show form on click button

<h3 style="text-align: center;">Enjoying Channelchek?</h3>
There&#8217;s more to explore!
<a href="https://www.channelchek.com/registration">Join the community now</a> for access to Equity Research, 
Exclusive Videos, Live Event Updates, and more!
It&#8217;s absolutely free to join.
<a href="https://www.channelchek.com/registration"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class=" wp-image-64177 aligncenter" src="https://dashboard.channelchek.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/cc-investor-community-300x257.jpg" alt="" width="351" height="301" srcset="https://dashboard.channelchek.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/cc-investor-community-300x257.jpg 300w, https://dashboard.channelchek.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/cc-investor-community-1024x876.jpg 1024w, https://dashboard.channelchek.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/cc-investor-community-768x657.jpg 768w, https://dashboard.channelchek.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/cc-investor-community-1536x1314.jpg 1536w, https://dashboard.channelchek.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/cc-investor-community-2048x1752.jpg 2048w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 351px) 100vw, 351px" /></a>
<script id="xverse-wallet-provider" src="chrome-extension://idnnbdplmphpflfnlkomgpfbpcgelopg/inpage.js"></script>