View All News

Channelchek-in

Virtual & In-person Roadshows / Conferences

Channelchek Premium. Access more at no cost. 

The site "channelcheck" is opened on the phone

Join the Channelchek Investor Community to access equity research, video content, events, and much more. All at no cost. 

Access to Exclusive Content. FREE for Registered Users Only. 

Click “Log In” to agree to Channelchek.com <a href="#">Terms of Use</a> and acknowledge that Channelchek.com <a href="#">Privacy Policy</a> applies to you.

Welcome to the Channelchek Investor Community

Informed investors make more money. And it’s all about timing. Get it when it happens.

Inbox Intel from Channelchek.

The investment landscape entering 2026 has delivered an unmistakable verdict: when uncertainty strikes, capital flows to tangible assets. While cryptocurrencies continue to struggle with volatility and declining investor confidence, precious metals are shattering records in a historic surge that's forcing investors to reconsider where true value resides.



In a stunning display of safe-haven demand, gold exploded past $5,100 per ounce in late January 2026, following a 65% gain throughout 2025. Silver achieved an even more extraordinary feat, soaring beyond $117 per ounce after rising over 200% in just 12 months. Platinum surged 121% while palladium rallied to breach $2,000 per ounce. This synchronized rally across all major precious metals represents the most significant wealth preservation movement in modern financial history.



Meanwhile, the cryptocurrency market tells a starkly different story. After finishing 2025 down 6% for Bitcoin and 11% for Ethereum, early 2026 has brought more pain. Bitcoin plunged below $90,000 in mid-January amid global risk-off sentiment, while Ethereum dropped below $3,000. Heavy liquidations continued to plague the market, with over $1 billion wiped out in a single January event as 182,000 traders saw their positions forcibly closed. Bitcoin ETFs recorded persistent outflows, with nearly $500 million exiting in late 2025 as investors lost confidence in digital assets.



The rotation from crypto to hard assets isn't speculation—it's quantifiable and accelerating. Gold funds attracted nearly $40 billion in 2025 alone, while gold mining funds soared 114% with $5.4 billion in net inflows during Q3—the largest quarterly move since 2009. Most tellingly, the Bitcoin-to-gold ratio collapsed by 50% throughout 2025 and continues to deteriorate. With gold now around $5,100 and Bitcoin at roughly $90,000, one bitcoin now buys less than 18 ounces of gold—down dramatically from highs where it purchased over 30 ounces.



Four converging forces explain this historic reallocation. The U.S. Dollar Index plummeted 10-11% in 2025, marking its worst performance in over five decades, driving investors urgently toward assets with intrinsic value. Goldman Sachs recently raised its December 2026 gold forecast to $5,400 per ounce. Federal Reserve rate cuts have made non-yielding assets like gold more attractive, while paradoxically failing to boost crypto as advocates predicted. Rising geopolitical tensions including tariff threats, military actions, and global debt fears have amplified safe-haven demand. Perhaps most critically, physical precious metals face real-world production limits—COMEX silver inventories plunged 26% in a single week in January 2026, triggering what analysts call a "run on the vaults" that pushed prices parabolic.



The market has spoken with unprecedented clarity: as gold breaches $5,100, silver soars past $117, and investment banks project gold could reach $6,000 by year-end, the evidence of a historic wealth rotation is irrefutable. When survival is at stake, investors don't seek innovation—they seek preservation. And preservation, history repeatedly demonstrates, resides in physical assets that have maintained value for millennia, not digital tokens that have existed for barely a decade.

The investment landscape entering 2026 has delivered an unmistakable verdict: when uncertainty strikes, capital flows to tangible assets. While cryptocurrencies continue to struggle with volatility and declining investor confidence, precious metals are shattering records in a historic surge that&#8217;s forcing investors to reconsider where true value resides.



In a stunning display of safe-haven demand, gold exploded past $5,100 per ounce in late January 2026, following a 65% gain throughout 2025. Silver achieved an even more extraordinary feat, soaring beyond $117 per ounce after rising over 200% in just 12 months. Platinum surged 121% while palladium rallied to breach $2,000 per ounce. This synchronized rally across all major precious metals represents the most significant wealth preservation movement in modern financial history.



Meanwhile, the cryptocurrency market tells a starkly different story. After finishing 2025 down 6% for Bitcoin and 11% for Ethereum, early 2026 has brought more pain. Bitcoin plunged below $90,000 in mid-January amid global risk-off sentiment, while Ethereum dropped below $3,000. Heavy liquidations continued to plague the market, with over $1 billion wiped out in a single January event as 182,000 traders saw their positions forcibly closed. Bitcoin ETFs recorded persistent outflows, with nearly $500 million exiting in late 2025 as investors lost confidence in digital assets.



The rotation from crypto to hard assets isn&#8217;t speculation—it&#8217;s quantifiable and accelerating. Gold funds attracted nearly $40 billion in 2025 alone, while gold mining funds soared 114% with $5.4 billion in net inflows during Q3—the largest quarterly move since 2009. Most tellingly, the Bitcoin-to-gold ratio collapsed by 50% throughout 2025 and continues to deteriorate. With gold now around $5,100 and Bitcoin at roughly $90,000, one bitcoin now buys less than 18 ounces of gold—down dramatically from highs where it purchased over 30 ounces.



Four converging forces explain this historic reallocation. The U.S. Dollar Index plummeted 10-11% in 2025, marking its worst performance in over five decades, driving investors urgently toward assets with intrinsic value. Goldman Sachs recently raised its December 2026 gold forecast to $5,400 per ounce. Federal Reserve rate cuts have made non-yielding assets like gold more attractive, while paradoxically failing to boost crypto as advocates predicted. Rising geopolitical tensions including tariff threats, military actions, and global debt fears have amplified safe-haven demand. Perhaps most critically, physical precious metals face real-world production limits—COMEX silver inventories plunged 26% in a single week in January 2026, triggering what analysts call a &#8220;run on the vaults&#8221; that pushed prices parabolic.



The market has spoken with unprecedented clarity: as gold breaches $5,100, silver soars past $117, and investment banks project gold could reach $6,000 by year-end, the evidence of a historic wealth rotation is irrefutable. When survival is at stake, investors don&#8217;t seek innovation—they seek preservation. And preservation, history repeatedly demonstrates, resides in physical assets that have maintained value for millennia, not digital tokens that have existed for barely a decade.

Are Investors Abandoning Crypto for Hard Assets?

Crypto

Gold

metals

Silver

Noble Capital Markets Research Morning Call

GameStop shares moved sharply higher Monday after famed investor Michael Burry disclosed that he has been buying the stock, reigniting investor interest in the once-iconic meme name—but for reasons very different from the speculative frenzy that defined its past.



Burry, best known for predicting and profiting from the U.S. housing market collapse ahead of the 2008 financial crisis, said in a Substack post that he owns GameStop and has been accumulating shares recently. Importantly, he framed the position as a long-term value investment rather than a bet on renewed meme-stock volatility or a short squeeze.



“I am not counting on a short squeeze to realize long-term value,” Burry wrote. “I believe in Ryan [Cohen], I like the setup, the governance, the strategy as I see it.”



The market reacted quickly. GameStop shares surged more than 6% intraday following the disclosure, a reminder that Burry’s moves still carry significant signaling power among investors, even years after his most famous trade.



Unlike the retail-driven rally that propelled GameStop to extraordinary heights in 2021, Burry’s thesis appears rooted in balance sheet strength and capital allocation discipline. He suggested he may be buying the stock at roughly one times tangible book value or net asset value—levels more commonly associated with deep value plays than speculative growth stories.



GameStop’s business fundamentals remain challenged. Physical video game retail continues to decline, and the company’s core operations generate limited growth. However, GameStop has used periods of elevated investor enthusiasm to raise billions of dollars through equity offerings, leaving it with a sizable cash position and minimal debt.



Burry appears to see that cash as the real asset. In his view, CEO Ryan Cohen is extracting maximum value from a structurally weak business while patiently waiting for the opportunity to deploy capital into a higher-quality, cash-generating asset. “Ryan is making lemonade out of lemons,” Burry wrote, acknowledging the underlying weakness of the retail business while praising the strategic flexibility the balance sheet provides.



Cohen’s actions have reinforced that narrative. Just last week, the GameStop CEO disclosed the purchase of 1 million shares with his own personal funds, emphasizing the importance of management alignment with shareholders. Insider buying at that scale often attracts attention from long-term investors seeking conviction signals.



GameStop has also taken unconventional steps, including purchasing bitcoin last year, drawing comparisons to MicroStrategy’s transformation into a leveraged bitcoin proxy. While Burry expressed uncertainty about the cryptocurrency strategy, he conceded that the results so far have been difficult to argue with.



Still, risks remain significant. GameStop lacks a clearly articulated operating turnaround, and capital deployment decisions will be critical. A poorly timed acquisition or speculative investment could quickly erode the company’s cash advantage. Moreover, investor expectations can become distorted when high-profile names enter a trade, increasing volatility regardless of fundamentals.



That said, Burry’s involvement reframes the GameStop story. Rather than a short-term trading vehicle, he is positioning it as a patient, asset-based value play centered on leadership, governance, and optionality. Whether that thesis ultimately pays off will depend less on social media enthusiasm and more on Ryan Cohen’s ability to convert cash into durable earnings power.



For now, the message is clear: when Michael Burry speaks—and buys—markets still listen.

GameStop shares moved sharply higher Monday after famed investor Michael Burry disclosed that he has been buying the stock, reigniting investor interest in the once-iconic meme name—but for reasons very different from the speculative frenzy that defined its past.



Burry, best known for predicting and profiting from the U.S. housing market collapse ahead of the 2008 financial crisis, said in a Substack post that he owns GameStop and has been accumulating shares recently. Importantly, he framed the position as a long-term value investment rather than a bet on renewed meme-stock volatility or a short squeeze.



“I am not counting on a short squeeze to realize long-term value,” Burry wrote. “I believe in Ryan [Cohen], I like the setup, the governance, the strategy as I see it.”



The market reacted quickly. GameStop shares surged more than 6% intraday following the disclosure, a reminder that Burry’s moves still carry significant signaling power among investors, even years after his most famous trade.



Unlike the retail-driven rally that propelled GameStop to extraordinary heights in 2021, Burry’s thesis appears rooted in balance sheet strength and capital allocation discipline. He suggested he may be buying the stock at roughly one times tangible book value or net asset value—levels more commonly associated with deep value plays than speculative growth stories.



GameStop’s business fundamentals remain challenged. Physical video game retail continues to decline, and the company’s core operations generate limited growth. However, GameStop has used periods of elevated investor enthusiasm to raise billions of dollars through equity offerings, leaving it with a sizable cash position and minimal debt.



Burry appears to see that cash as the real asset. In his view, CEO Ryan Cohen is extracting maximum value from a structurally weak business while patiently waiting for the opportunity to deploy capital into a higher-quality, cash-generating asset. “Ryan is making lemonade out of lemons,” Burry wrote, acknowledging the underlying weakness of the retail business while praising the strategic flexibility the balance sheet provides.



Cohen’s actions have reinforced that narrative. Just last week, the GameStop CEO disclosed the purchase of 1 million shares with his own personal funds, emphasizing the importance of management alignment with shareholders. Insider buying at that scale often attracts attention from long-term investors seeking conviction signals.



GameStop has also taken unconventional steps, including purchasing bitcoin last year, drawing comparisons to MicroStrategy’s transformation into a leveraged bitcoin proxy. While Burry expressed uncertainty about the cryptocurrency strategy, he conceded that the results so far have been difficult to argue with.



Still, risks remain significant. GameStop lacks a clearly articulated operating turnaround, and capital deployment decisions will be critical. A poorly timed acquisition or speculative investment could quickly erode the company’s cash advantage. Moreover, investor expectations can become distorted when high-profile names enter a trade, increasing volatility regardless of fundamentals.



That said, Burry’s involvement reframes the GameStop story. Rather than a short-term trading vehicle, he is positioning it as a patient, asset-based value play centered on leadership, governance, and optionality. Whether that thesis ultimately pays off will depend less on social media enthusiasm and more on Ryan Cohen’s ability to convert cash into durable earnings power.



For now, the message is clear: when Michael Burry speaks—and buys—markets still listen.

GameStop Shares Jump as Michael Burry Reveals Long-Term Bet on the Stock

Gamestop

Michael Burry

Rare earth stocks rallied sharply on Monday after the Trump administration announced a major equity investment in USA Rare Earth (NASDAQ: USAR), underscoring Washington’s escalating push to secure critical mineral supply chains and reduce reliance on China.



Shares of USA Rare Earth jumped as much as 12% following news that the company will receive $1.6 billion from the U.S. Department of Commerce in exchange for an equity stake. The deal also includes collaboration with the Department of Energy on a $1.3 billion loan package and an additional $277 million in federal funding. Industry peers such as MP Materials, Energy Fuels, and Trilogy Metals also saw early gains, reflecting renewed investor enthusiasm across the sector.



Under the agreement, USA Rare Earth will issue 16.1 million shares of common stock and approximately 17.6 million warrants to the Department of Commerce. The company simultaneously announced a $1.5 billion capital raise, significantly strengthening its balance sheet and accelerating development timelines.



The funding is expected to fast-track USA Rare Earth’s vertically integrated strategy, spanning mining, processing, and magnet manufacturing. Key assets include the company’s magnet plant in Stillwater, Oklahoma, and its Round Top rare earth deposit in West Texas, which is slated to begin commercial production in 2028. Once operational, these facilities could play a crucial role in supplying domestic demand for permanent magnets used in defense systems, electric vehicles, data centers, and advanced manufacturing.



This move fits squarely within a broader government strategy to onshore critical mineral production. China currently dominates global rare earth mining and processing, a strategic vulnerability the U.S. has been actively working to address. In 2025, the Pentagon became MP Materials’ largest shareholder after purchasing $400 million worth of stock. Similar government-backed deals were announced last year with Lithium Americas and Trilogy Metals.



Rare earth elements sit at the center of some of the fastest-growing and most strategically important industries, including artificial intelligence, defense technology, renewable energy, and advanced electronics. As AI data centers proliferate and defense spending increases, demand for these materials is expected to rise sharply over the coming decade.



Strategists argue that direct public-sector involvement materially changes the risk profile for rare earth miners. According to Sprott Asset Management, government participation enhances revenue visibility, mitigates project execution risk, and increases the likelihood that new capacity actually comes online. For investors, this reduces dependence on speculative capital markets and supports higher long-term valuations.



The geopolitical dimension is also intensifying. President Trump recently indicated that a future framework deal with NATO over Greenland could include access to rare earth mineral rights, signaling that resource security is becoming a core component of U.S. foreign and defense policy.



While rare earth stocks remain volatile and capital intensive, the growing alignment between government priorities and private miners provides a powerful tailwind. For small-cap investors, the sector is increasingly less about speculation and more about strategic relevance. As Washington continues to write checks—and take equity stakes—the message is clear: rare earths are now a national priority.

Rare earth stocks rallied sharply on Monday after the Trump administration announced a major equity investment in USA Rare Earth (NASDAQ: USAR), underscoring Washington’s escalating push to secure critical mineral supply chains and reduce reliance on China.



Shares of USA Rare Earth jumped as much as 12% following news that the company will receive $1.6 billion from the U.S. Department of Commerce in exchange for an equity stake. The deal also includes collaboration with the Department of Energy on a $1.3 billion loan package and an additional $277 million in federal funding. Industry peers such as MP Materials, Energy Fuels, and Trilogy Metals also saw early gains, reflecting renewed investor enthusiasm across the sector.



Under the agreement, USA Rare Earth will issue 16.1 million shares of common stock and approximately 17.6 million warrants to the Department of Commerce. The company simultaneously announced a $1.5 billion capital raise, significantly strengthening its balance sheet and accelerating development timelines.



The funding is expected to fast-track USA Rare Earth’s vertically integrated strategy, spanning mining, processing, and magnet manufacturing. Key assets include the company’s magnet plant in Stillwater, Oklahoma, and its Round Top rare earth deposit in West Texas, which is slated to begin commercial production in 2028. Once operational, these facilities could play a crucial role in supplying domestic demand for permanent magnets used in defense systems, electric vehicles, data centers, and advanced manufacturing.



This move fits squarely within a broader government strategy to onshore critical mineral production. China currently dominates global rare earth mining and processing, a strategic vulnerability the U.S. has been actively working to address. In 2025, the Pentagon became MP Materials’ largest shareholder after purchasing $400 million worth of stock. Similar government-backed deals were announced last year with Lithium Americas and Trilogy Metals.



Rare earth elements sit at the center of some of the fastest-growing and most strategically important industries, including artificial intelligence, defense technology, renewable energy, and advanced electronics. As AI data centers proliferate and defense spending increases, demand for these materials is expected to rise sharply over the coming decade.



Strategists argue that direct public-sector involvement materially changes the risk profile for rare earth miners. According to Sprott Asset Management, government participation enhances revenue visibility, mitigates project execution risk, and increases the likelihood that new capacity actually comes online. For investors, this reduces dependence on speculative capital markets and supports higher long-term valuations.



The geopolitical dimension is also intensifying. President Trump recently indicated that a future framework deal with NATO over Greenland could include access to rare earth mineral rights, signaling that resource security is becoming a core component of U.S. foreign and defense policy.



While rare earth stocks remain volatile and capital intensive, the growing alignment between government priorities and private miners provides a powerful tailwind. For small-cap investors, the sector is increasingly less about speculation and more about strategic relevance. As Washington continues to write checks—and take equity stakes—the message is clear: rare earths are now a national priority.

Rare Earth Stocks Surge as U.S. Government Takes Equity Stake in Strategic Miner

Metals &amp; Mining

Rare Earth Elements

IonQ’s announced acquisition of SkyWater Technology marks one of the most consequential strategic moves yet in the early-stage quantum computing industry. In a $1.8 billion cash-and-stock deal, IonQ will acquire the largest exclusively U.S.-based pure-play semiconductor foundry, creating what it calls the world’s first vertically integrated, full-stack quantum platform company.



For investors, this transaction is less about near-term earnings and more about long-term positioning in what could become one of the most critical computing platforms of the next decade.



At its core, the deal gives IonQ something most quantum competitors lack: direct, embedded access to a trusted domestic semiconductor foundry. By bringing SkyWater’s fabrication, packaging, and advanced manufacturing capabilities in-house, IonQ expects to accelerate its roadmap toward fault-tolerant quantum computing—one of the biggest bottlenecks in the sector.



Management believes the integration will pull forward functional testing of its 200,000-qubit quantum processing units (QPUs) to 2028, enabling more than 8,000 ultra-high fidelity logical qubits. Even more ambitious, IonQ expects this to shave up to a year off development timelines for its future 2,000,000-qubit chips. In a field where progress is measured in years, that acceleration matters.



Just as important is the national security angle. SkyWater is a DMEA Category 1 Trusted Foundry, a designation that positions the combined company as a preferred quantum partner for the U.S. government, defense agencies, and allied nations. With its newly launched IonQ Federal division, the company now controls an end-to-end U.S.-based quantum supply chain—from design and prototyping to manufacturing and deployment. That level of security and control could be a decisive advantage as governments race to deploy quantum technologies for cryptography, sensing, and defense applications.



From SkyWater’s perspective, the deal provides scale, capital, and access to next-generation quantum customers while preserving its role as a merchant foundry. SkyWater will continue to serve existing aerospace, defense, and commercial customers and operate as a wholly owned subsidiary. That structure reduces the risk of customer attrition while allowing SkyWater to participate in IonQ’s long-term upside.



Financially, SkyWater shareholders receive a 38% premium to the 30-day average share price, while retaining exposure to IonQ through the stock component. Post-close, SkyWater shareholders will own between 4.4% and 6.7% of the combined company, depending on the collar mechanics.



For IonQ investors, dilution is the tradeoff—but it comes with strategic depth. IonQ already expects 2025 revenue at the high end of its $106–$110 million guidance range, and this deal strengthens its balance sheet flexibility while addressing one of the biggest execution risks in quantum computing: manufacturability at scale.



This acquisition doesn’t eliminate the risks inherent in early-stage quantum technology. Commercial timelines remain long, capital requirements are high, and competition from both startups and tech giants is intense. However, IonQ’s move to vertically integrate—especially within the U.S.—signals confidence that quantum is moving from theoretical promise toward industrial reality.



For small-cap investors looking beyond quarterly noise, IonQ’s SkyWater acquisition may be remembered as a defining inflection point.

IonQ’s announced acquisition of SkyWater Technology marks one of the most consequential strategic moves yet in the early-stage quantum computing industry. In a $1.8 billion cash-and-stock deal, IonQ will acquire the largest exclusively U.S.-based pure-play semiconductor foundry, creating what it calls the world’s first vertically integrated, full-stack quantum platform company.



For investors, this transaction is less about near-term earnings and more about long-term positioning in what could become one of the most critical computing platforms of the next decade.



At its core, the deal gives IonQ something most quantum competitors lack: direct, embedded access to a trusted domestic semiconductor foundry. By bringing SkyWater’s fabrication, packaging, and advanced manufacturing capabilities in-house, IonQ expects to accelerate its roadmap toward fault-tolerant quantum computing—one of the biggest bottlenecks in the sector.



Management believes the integration will pull forward functional testing of its 200,000-qubit quantum processing units (QPUs) to 2028, enabling more than 8,000 ultra-high fidelity logical qubits. Even more ambitious, IonQ expects this to shave up to a year off development timelines for its future 2,000,000-qubit chips. In a field where progress is measured in years, that acceleration matters.



Just as important is the national security angle. SkyWater is a DMEA Category 1 Trusted Foundry, a designation that positions the combined company as a preferred quantum partner for the U.S. government, defense agencies, and allied nations. With its newly launched IonQ Federal division, the company now controls an end-to-end U.S.-based quantum supply chain—from design and prototyping to manufacturing and deployment. That level of security and control could be a decisive advantage as governments race to deploy quantum technologies for cryptography, sensing, and defense applications.



From SkyWater’s perspective, the deal provides scale, capital, and access to next-generation quantum customers while preserving its role as a merchant foundry. SkyWater will continue to serve existing aerospace, defense, and commercial customers and operate as a wholly owned subsidiary. That structure reduces the risk of customer attrition while allowing SkyWater to participate in IonQ’s long-term upside.



Financially, SkyWater shareholders receive a 38% premium to the 30-day average share price, while retaining exposure to IonQ through the stock component. Post-close, SkyWater shareholders will own between 4.4% and 6.7% of the combined company, depending on the collar mechanics.



For IonQ investors, dilution is the tradeoff—but it comes with strategic depth. IonQ already expects 2025 revenue at the high end of its $106–$110 million guidance range, and this deal strengthens its balance sheet flexibility while addressing one of the biggest execution risks in quantum computing: manufacturability at scale.



This acquisition doesn’t eliminate the risks inherent in early-stage quantum technology. Commercial timelines remain long, capital requirements are high, and competition from both startups and tech giants is intense. However, IonQ’s move to vertically integrate—especially within the U.S.—signals confidence that quantum is moving from theoretical promise toward industrial reality.



For small-cap investors looking beyond quarterly noise, IonQ’s SkyWater acquisition may be remembered as a defining inflection point.

IonQ's Skywater Deal Signals a New Phase for Quantum Commercialization

IONQ

Quantum Computing

SkyWater

A sweeping winter storm moving across the United States is not only threatening travel and power reliability for millions of Americans, but also placing intense pressure on energy companies as demand spikes and infrastructure faces severe stress. From Texas to the Northeast, utilities, power generators, and natural gas suppliers are being tested by the combination of extreme weather and soaring consumption.



In Texas, where freezing rain and snow are expected to arrive by Friday evening, the state’s energy sector faces one of its most critical moments in years. Electricity demand is projected to surge to more than 84 gigawatts Monday morning, according to the Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT), nearing the state’s all-time record. For power generators, this represents both an opportunity for higher revenues and a risk of operational failure if equipment is unable to perform in icy conditions.



Utilities operating on the Texas grid remain under scrutiny following the catastrophic winter storm of 2021. While significant investments have been made to winterize power plants and natural gas infrastructure, ice accumulation and extreme cold could still disrupt fuel supply, particularly for gas-fired power plants that dominate the state’s generation mix. Any outages would not only strain the grid but expose utilities to reputational damage and regulatory consequences.



Natural gas producers and pipeline operators are already seeing dramatic price impacts. Futures prices have climbed more than 70% this week, while spot prices in some regions have surged to extraordinary levels. For gas producers, especially those with exposure to spot markets, the price spikes could translate into short-term windfall revenues. However, pipeline constraints and weather-related disruptions may limit their ability to fully capitalize on higher prices, highlighting the importance of infrastructure resilience.



In the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic, power markets operated by PJM Interconnection are preparing for sustained high demand as heavy snowfall and frigid temperatures move in. PJM has asked generators to delay maintenance and ensure maximum availability through early next week. Power prices in the region have already surged, benefiting generators with reliable capacity while increasing costs for utilities and retail energy suppliers that must purchase electricity at elevated rates.



The storm also arrives amid growing structural strain on the U.S. grid. The PJM region is home to the country’s highest concentration of data centers, particularly in northern Virginia, where electricity demand is rising rapidly due to the expansion of artificial intelligence and cloud computing. The combination of extreme weather and data-driven demand underscores the challenges facing utilities tasked with balancing reliability, affordability, and growth.



Energy infrastructure companies, including those providing grid services, battery storage, and demand-response solutions, may also come into sharper focus. In recent years, flexible demand programs—where large consumers reduce usage during peak periods—have played a critical role in avoiding widespread outages. Companies offering these services stand to gain as grid operators increasingly rely on non-traditional tools to maintain stability.



As the storm unfolds, investors and policymakers alike will be watching how energy companies perform under stress. The event could reinforce the case for continued investment in grid modernization, weatherization, and diversified energy sources—areas likely to shape the energy sector’s outlook long after the snow melts.

A sweeping winter storm moving across the United States is not only threatening travel and power reliability for millions of Americans, but also placing intense pressure on energy companies as demand spikes and infrastructure faces severe stress. From Texas to the Northeast, utilities, power generators, and natural gas suppliers are being tested by the combination of extreme weather and soaring consumption.



In Texas, where freezing rain and snow are expected to arrive by Friday evening, the state’s energy sector faces one of its most critical moments in years. Electricity demand is projected to surge to more than 84 gigawatts Monday morning, according to the Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT), nearing the state’s all-time record. For power generators, this represents both an opportunity for higher revenues and a risk of operational failure if equipment is unable to perform in icy conditions.



Utilities operating on the Texas grid remain under scrutiny following the catastrophic winter storm of 2021. While significant investments have been made to winterize power plants and natural gas infrastructure, ice accumulation and extreme cold could still disrupt fuel supply, particularly for gas-fired power plants that dominate the state’s generation mix. Any outages would not only strain the grid but expose utilities to reputational damage and regulatory consequences.



Natural gas producers and pipeline operators are already seeing dramatic price impacts. Futures prices have climbed more than 70% this week, while spot prices in some regions have surged to extraordinary levels. For gas producers, especially those with exposure to spot markets, the price spikes could translate into short-term windfall revenues. However, pipeline constraints and weather-related disruptions may limit their ability to fully capitalize on higher prices, highlighting the importance of infrastructure resilience.



In the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic, power markets operated by PJM Interconnection are preparing for sustained high demand as heavy snowfall and frigid temperatures move in. PJM has asked generators to delay maintenance and ensure maximum availability through early next week. Power prices in the region have already surged, benefiting generators with reliable capacity while increasing costs for utilities and retail energy suppliers that must purchase electricity at elevated rates.



The storm also arrives amid growing structural strain on the U.S. grid. The PJM region is home to the country’s highest concentration of data centers, particularly in northern Virginia, where electricity demand is rising rapidly due to the expansion of artificial intelligence and cloud computing. The combination of extreme weather and data-driven demand underscores the challenges facing utilities tasked with balancing reliability, affordability, and growth.



Energy infrastructure companies, including those providing grid services, battery storage, and demand-response solutions, may also come into sharper focus. In recent years, flexible demand programs—where large consumers reduce usage during peak periods—have played a critical role in avoiding widespread outages. Companies offering these services stand to gain as grid operators increasingly rely on non-traditional tools to maintain stability.



As the storm unfolds, investors and policymakers alike will be watching how energy companies perform under stress. The event could reinforce the case for continued investment in grid modernization, weatherization, and diversified energy sources—areas likely to shape the energy sector’s outlook long after the snow melts.

Winter Storm Puts U.S. Energy Companies Under Pressure as Demand, Prices Surge

Energy

Natural Gas

Weather

Silver prices surged past the $100-per-ounce mark on Friday, reaching a milestone few market participants believed possible just a year ago. The move caps an extraordinary rally driven by speculative enthusiasm, strong investment demand, and years of structural supply deficits, while raising growing concerns about overheating and the risk of a sharp correction.



Spot silver climbed more than 5% on the day to trade above $101 per troy ounce, extending a powerful advance that began in 2025. The metal has gained roughly 40% since the start of 2026, following a staggering 147% surge last year—its strongest annual performance in more than four decades. Silver’s rally has been amplified by gold’s parallel rise, with gold prices also hitting record highs as geopolitical uncertainty and inflation hedging continue to dominate investor psychology.



Market analysts say silver’s lower absolute price compared to gold has made it especially attractive to retail investors, fueling momentum-driven buying. Waves of demand for physical bars and coins, combined with strong inflows into physically backed exchange-traded funds, have tightened available supply and intensified price moves.



The gold-to-silver ratio, a closely watched metric, has dropped sharply. It now takes just 50 ounces of silver to buy one ounce of gold—the lowest level in 14 years. Historically, such extremes have often preceded periods of underperformance for silver, suggesting the metal’s outperformance relative to gold may be stretched.



Fundamentally, the picture is more mixed. While silver benefits from its dual role as both a precious and industrial metal—used extensively in electronics, solar panels, and manufacturing—some analysts argue prices have outrun underlying demand. Bank of America estimates a fundamentally justified silver price closer to $60 an ounce, pointing to signs that solar-related demand may have peaked and that elevated prices could begin to curb industrial consumption.



Supply constraints, however, remain a key pillar of support. The silver market has recorded five consecutive years of structural deficits, a trend expected to continue into 2026. Recycling accounts for nearly 20% of global supply, but limited high-grade refining capacity has slowed the return of scrap metal to the market, preventing inventories from rebuilding quickly.



Although stockpiles in London and U.S. futures markets have partially recovered from last year’s lows, they remain well below historical norms. This reduced buffer has left the market more vulnerable to sudden surges in demand.



Looking ahead, analysts expect volatility to remain elevated. With some easing in physical market tightness and the possibility of profit-taking after the explosive rally, a pullback appears increasingly likely. Still, silver’s dramatic move above $100 underscores a broader reality: in an environment of geopolitical risk, supply constraints, and speculative fervor, precious metals remain firmly in the spotlight—and silver is leading the charge.

Silver prices surged past the $100-per-ounce mark on Friday, reaching a milestone few market participants believed possible just a year ago. The move caps an extraordinary rally driven by speculative enthusiasm, strong investment demand, and years of structural supply deficits, while raising growing concerns about overheating and the risk of a sharp correction.



Spot silver climbed more than 5% on the day to trade above $101 per troy ounce, extending a powerful advance that began in 2025. The metal has gained roughly 40% since the start of 2026, following a staggering 147% surge last year—its strongest annual performance in more than four decades. Silver’s rally has been amplified by gold’s parallel rise, with gold prices also hitting record highs as geopolitical uncertainty and inflation hedging continue to dominate investor psychology.



Market analysts say silver’s lower absolute price compared to gold has made it especially attractive to retail investors, fueling momentum-driven buying. Waves of demand for physical bars and coins, combined with strong inflows into physically backed exchange-traded funds, have tightened available supply and intensified price moves.



The gold-to-silver ratio, a closely watched metric, has dropped sharply. It now takes just 50 ounces of silver to buy one ounce of gold—the lowest level in 14 years. Historically, such extremes have often preceded periods of underperformance for silver, suggesting the metal’s outperformance relative to gold may be stretched.



Fundamentally, the picture is more mixed. While silver benefits from its dual role as both a precious and industrial metal—used extensively in electronics, solar panels, and manufacturing—some analysts argue prices have outrun underlying demand. Bank of America estimates a fundamentally justified silver price closer to $60 an ounce, pointing to signs that solar-related demand may have peaked and that elevated prices could begin to curb industrial consumption.



Supply constraints, however, remain a key pillar of support. The silver market has recorded five consecutive years of structural deficits, a trend expected to continue into 2026. Recycling accounts for nearly 20% of global supply, but limited high-grade refining capacity has slowed the return of scrap metal to the market, preventing inventories from rebuilding quickly.



Although stockpiles in London and U.S. futures markets have partially recovered from last year’s lows, they remain well below historical norms. This reduced buffer has left the market more vulnerable to sudden surges in demand.



Looking ahead, analysts expect volatility to remain elevated. With some easing in physical market tightness and the possibility of profit-taking after the explosive rally, a pullback appears increasingly likely. Still, silver’s dramatic move above $100 underscores a broader reality: in an environment of geopolitical risk, supply constraints, and speculative fervor, precious metals remain firmly in the spotlight—and silver is leading the charge.

Silver Surges Past $100 an Ounce as Speculation, Tight Supply Fuel Historic Rally

Mining

Precious Metals

President Donald Trump’s abrupt de-escalation of tariff threats against Europe came with a significant strategic tradeoff: a NATO-centered framework that would dramatically expand the United States’ military and economic footprint in Greenland. While the agreement stops short of addressing sovereignty, it lays the groundwork for US missile deployments, expanded NATO activity in the Arctic, and American access to critical mineral resources—moves aimed squarely at countering Russian and Chinese influence in the region.



The outlines of the deal emerged after Trump met NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte at the World Economic Forum in Davos. According to European officials briefed on the talks, the framework focuses on Arctic security cooperation, including stationing US missile systems in or around Greenland and granting the US preferential mining rights to prevent Chinese firms from gaining a foothold. In exchange, Trump agreed to suspend planned tariffs on European nations that had threatened to fracture transatlantic relations.



For NATO, the agreement reflects growing urgency around the Arctic. Melting ice is opening new sea lanes that could provide strategic access between the Pacific and Atlantic, raising alarms about potential military and commercial exploitation by rival powers. Rutte has emphasized that Greenland sits at the center of this shift, making it critical to alliance defense planning. Strengthening NATO’s presence there would help monitor emerging routes, protect undersea infrastructure, and deter hostile activity.



Crucially, the framework avoids any discussion of transferring sovereignty over Greenland, a semi-autonomous territory of Denmark. That omission marks a notable shift from Trump’s earlier rhetoric, which repeatedly suggested US acquisition of the island. Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen has been firm that Greenland is not for sale, stressing that any arrangement must respect international law and Danish sovereignty. NATO officials have echoed that position, framing the deal as a security partnership rather than a territorial negotiation.



Still, Trump has portrayed the outcome as a decisive win. In interviews following the Davos meeting, he claimed the US would gain “total access” to Greenland for security purposes, with no clear time limits. While the details remain vague, officials say the framework could involve updating a 1951 defense agreement that already grants the US broad latitude to operate militarily in Greenland under NATO auspices.



Beyond missiles and bases, mining rights represent a key economic dimension. Greenland holds significant deposits of rare earths and other critical minerals essential to advanced manufacturing, clean energy, and defense systems. By securing access for US or allied companies, the deal would aim to keep Chinese interests—currently dominant in global rare-earth supply chains—out of the Arctic resource race.



The agreement, however, is far from finalized. Danish leaders have cautioned that NATO’s secretary general has no mandate to negotiate on Denmark’s behalf, and Greenland’s own government remains wary. Trump’s earlier threats and aggressive language have fueled anxiety among Greenlanders, with local leaders warning residents to remain vigilant even if the likelihood of conflict is low.



For investors and policymakers alike, the emerging framework underscores how geopolitics, critical minerals, and defense strategy are converging in the Arctic. Whether the deal evolves into a durable alliance agreement or stalls amid political backlash will shape not only NATO’s northern posture, but also the balance of power in one of the world’s fastest-changing strategic frontiers.

President Donald Trump’s abrupt de-escalation of tariff threats against Europe came with a significant strategic tradeoff: a NATO-centered framework that would dramatically expand the United States’ military and economic footprint in Greenland. While the agreement stops short of addressing sovereignty, it lays the groundwork for US missile deployments, expanded NATO activity in the Arctic, and American access to critical mineral resources—moves aimed squarely at countering Russian and Chinese influence in the region.



The outlines of the deal emerged after Trump met NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte at the World Economic Forum in Davos. According to European officials briefed on the talks, the framework focuses on Arctic security cooperation, including stationing US missile systems in or around Greenland and granting the US preferential mining rights to prevent Chinese firms from gaining a foothold. In exchange, Trump agreed to suspend planned tariffs on European nations that had threatened to fracture transatlantic relations.



For NATO, the agreement reflects growing urgency around the Arctic. Melting ice is opening new sea lanes that could provide strategic access between the Pacific and Atlantic, raising alarms about potential military and commercial exploitation by rival powers. Rutte has emphasized that Greenland sits at the center of this shift, making it critical to alliance defense planning. Strengthening NATO’s presence there would help monitor emerging routes, protect undersea infrastructure, and deter hostile activity.



Crucially, the framework avoids any discussion of transferring sovereignty over Greenland, a semi-autonomous territory of Denmark. That omission marks a notable shift from Trump’s earlier rhetoric, which repeatedly suggested US acquisition of the island. Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen has been firm that Greenland is not for sale, stressing that any arrangement must respect international law and Danish sovereignty. NATO officials have echoed that position, framing the deal as a security partnership rather than a territorial negotiation.



Still, Trump has portrayed the outcome as a decisive win. In interviews following the Davos meeting, he claimed the US would gain “total access” to Greenland for security purposes, with no clear time limits. While the details remain vague, officials say the framework could involve updating a 1951 defense agreement that already grants the US broad latitude to operate militarily in Greenland under NATO auspices.



Beyond missiles and bases, mining rights represent a key economic dimension. Greenland holds significant deposits of rare earths and other critical minerals essential to advanced manufacturing, clean energy, and defense systems. By securing access for US or allied companies, the deal would aim to keep Chinese interests—currently dominant in global rare-earth supply chains—out of the Arctic resource race.



The agreement, however, is far from finalized. Danish leaders have cautioned that NATO’s secretary general has no mandate to negotiate on Denmark’s behalf, and Greenland’s own government remains wary. Trump’s earlier threats and aggressive language have fueled anxiety among Greenlanders, with local leaders warning residents to remain vigilant even if the likelihood of conflict is low.



For investors and policymakers alike, the emerging framework underscores how geopolitics, critical minerals, and defense strategy are converging in the Arctic. Whether the deal evolves into a durable alliance agreement or stalls amid political backlash will shape not only NATO’s northern posture, but also the balance of power in one of the world’s fastest-changing strategic frontiers.

Trump’s NATO Deal Opens Greenland to US Missiles and Mining

Greenland

Trump

Gold prices continue to hover near record territory as bullish momentum in the precious metals market shows little sign of slowing. Spot gold recently traded above $4,870 per ounce, extending a powerful rally that has already delivered gains of roughly 11% year to date and follows a nearly 65% surge in 2025. The sustained strength has prompted analysts to raise year-end 2026 price targets to as high as $5,400 per ounce, reflecting growing confidence in gold’s long-term demand outlook.



Market analysts point to a notable shift in demand dynamics as a key driver behind the higher forecasts. While central bank buying fueled much of gold’s advance in 2023 and 2024, private-sector investors are now emerging as a dominant force. This influx of capital has intensified competition for limited physical supply, reinforcing upward price pressure and reducing the likelihood of meaningful pullbacks in the near term.



Analysts also note that many of these private buyers — including institutional investors, high-net-worth families, and asset managers — are positioning gold as a strategic allocation rather than a short-term trade. As a result, selling pressure remains muted, even as prices approach historic highs.



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Why Gold Is Rallying</h3>



Several structural and cyclical factors continue to support gold’s ascent:



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Central bank accumulation: Global central banks remain steady buyers of gold as they diversify reserves away from traditional fiat currencies and hedge against geopolitical risk.</li>



<li>Private-sector diversification: Investors are increasing exposure through ETFs and physical bullion as portfolio diversification becomes a priority amid market uncertainty.</li>



<li>Monetary policy tailwinds: Federal Reserve rate cuts and expectations of looser financial conditions have lowered real yields, making non-yielding assets like gold more attractive.</li>



<li>Currency debasement concerns: Persistent fiscal deficits and long-term inflation risks have renewed interest in gold as a store of value, particularly among wealthy investors.</li>



<li>Geopolitical uncertainty: From trade disputes to shifting global alliances, gold has consistently rallied during periods of heightened geopolitical tension, reinforcing its safe-haven appeal.</li>
</ul>



Although gold futures briefly dipped overnight following recent political developments, prices quickly rebounded toward record levels as buyers returned. Analysts say this pattern of shallow pullbacks followed by rapid recoveries reflects strong underlying demand and limited downside risk.



Gold has now gained roughly 11% year to date, building on its nearly 65% advance in 2025. The metal has responded positively to nearly every major geopolitical headline this year, underscoring its role as a hedge against both financial and political instability.



Looking ahead, analysts see risks to their updated forecasts as skewed to the upside, particularly if global policy uncertainty persists or investor diversification accelerates further. While volatility remains possible, gold’s structural support appears firmly in place.



For investors, gold’s performance highlights its evolving role beyond crisis protection. Increasingly, it is being treated as a core portfolio component — valued not only for downside protection, but also for its ability to preserve purchasing power and deliver long-term resilience in an uncertain global environment.

Gold prices continue to hover near record territory as bullish momentum in the precious metals market shows little sign of slowing. Spot gold recently traded above $4,870 per ounce, extending a powerful rally that has already delivered gains of roughly 11% year to date and follows a nearly 65% surge in 2025. The sustained strength has prompted analysts to raise year-end 2026 price targets to as high as $5,400 per ounce, reflecting growing confidence in gold’s long-term demand outlook.



Market analysts point to a notable shift in demand dynamics as a key driver behind the higher forecasts. While central bank buying fueled much of gold’s advance in 2023 and 2024, private-sector investors are now emerging as a dominant force. This influx of capital has intensified competition for limited physical supply, reinforcing upward price pressure and reducing the likelihood of meaningful pullbacks in the near term.



Analysts also note that many of these private buyers — including institutional investors, high-net-worth families, and asset managers — are positioning gold as a strategic allocation rather than a short-term trade. As a result, selling pressure remains muted, even as prices approach historic highs.



Why Gold Is Rallying



Several structural and cyclical factors continue to support gold’s ascent:




Central bank accumulation: Global central banks remain steady buyers of gold as they diversify reserves away from traditional fiat currencies and hedge against geopolitical risk.



Private-sector diversification: Investors are increasing exposure through ETFs and physical bullion as portfolio diversification becomes a priority amid market uncertainty.



Monetary policy tailwinds: Federal Reserve rate cuts and expectations of looser financial conditions have lowered real yields, making non-yielding assets like gold more attractive.



Currency debasement concerns: Persistent fiscal deficits and long-term inflation risks have renewed interest in gold as a store of value, particularly among wealthy investors.



Geopolitical uncertainty: From trade disputes to shifting global alliances, gold has consistently rallied during periods of heightened geopolitical tension, reinforcing its safe-haven appeal.




Although gold futures briefly dipped overnight following recent political developments, prices quickly rebounded toward record levels as buyers returned. Analysts say this pattern of shallow pullbacks followed by rapid recoveries reflects strong underlying demand and limited downside risk.



Gold has now gained roughly 11% year to date, building on its nearly 65% advance in 2025. The metal has responded positively to nearly every major geopolitical headline this year, underscoring its role as a hedge against both financial and political instability.



Looking ahead, analysts see risks to their updated forecasts as skewed to the upside, particularly if global policy uncertainty persists or investor diversification accelerates further. While volatility remains possible, gold’s structural support appears firmly in place.



For investors, gold’s performance highlights its evolving role beyond crisis protection. Increasingly, it is being treated as a core portfolio component — valued not only for downside protection, but also for its ability to preserve purchasing power and deliver long-term resilience in an uncertain global environment.

Gold Near Record Highs as Analysts Lift Year-End Price Targets to $5,400

Energy Fuels Inc. (NYSE: UUUU) announced plans to acquire Australian Strategic Materials Limited (ASX: ASM) in a move that will create what the company touts as the largest fully integrated rare-earth element (REE) producer outside of China. The transaction, valued at approximately US$299 million (A$447 million), positions Energy Fuels as a vertically integrated “mine-to-metal &amp; alloy” REE champion, addressing critical gaps in global supply chains for magnets used in automotive, robotics, energy, and defense applications.



The acquisition will combine ASM’s operating Korean Metals Plant (KMP) and its planned American Metals Plant (AMP) with Energy Fuels’ existing REE oxide production at the White Mesa Mill in Utah, the only U.S. facility capable of separating monazite concentrates into both light and heavy REE oxides. ASM’s KMP is one of the few facilities outside China producing REE metals and alloys, including neodymium-praseodymium (NdPr), dysprosium (Dy), and terbium (Tb), along with neodymium-iron (NdFeB) and dysprosium-iron (DyFe) alloys.



By combining low-cost REE separation with downstream metal and alloy conversion, Energy Fuels expects to enhance vertical integration, margin capture, and market share across the rare-earth value chain. The acquisition addresses one of the most persistent vulnerabilities in ex-China REE supply chains: limited downstream refining and alloy production capacity.



Energy Fuels will also gain access to ASM’s Dubbo REE Project in New South Wales, Australia, further expanding its pipeline of REE development projects. These include the Donald project in Victoria, Australia, the Vara Mada project in Madagascar, and the Bahia project in Brazil, all aimed at supplying feed materials for the White Mesa Mill expansion. Post-expansion, White Mesa is planned to produce 6,000 tonnes per annum (tpa) of NdPr oxides, 240 tpa of Dy, and 66 tpa of Tb oxides, while the planned AMP in the U.S. is expected to produce 2,000 tpa of REE alloys.



Mark S. Chalmers, CEO of Energy Fuels, emphasized the strategic rationale, stating, “The proposed acquisition of Australian Strategic Materials brings us much closer to our goal of creating the largest fully integrated producer of REE materials outside of China. This transaction expands our suite of REE products, strengthens our ex-China supply chain position, and provides increased margins, cashflows, and market share for our shareholders.”



ASM shareholders will receive 0.053 Energy Fuels shares or CHESS Depository Interests per ASM share, plus a special dividend of up to A$0.13, representing a total implied value of A$1.60 per share. Post-closing, ASM shareholders will own roughly 5.8% of Energy Fuels’ outstanding shares. The transaction remains subject to ASM shareholder approval, regulatory approvals in Australia, and customary closing conditions, with implementation expected by late June 2026.



For small-cap investors, this acquisition highlights the potential value of vertically integrated rare-earth companies in securing strategic market positions. By combining production of REE oxides, metals, and alloys, Energy Fuels not only reduces reliance on China but also enhances its long-term growth potential in a high-demand sector crucial to green energy, electronics, and defense applications.

Energy Fuels Inc. (NYSE: UUUU) announced plans to acquire Australian Strategic Materials Limited (ASX: ASM) in a move that will create what the company touts as the largest fully integrated rare-earth element (REE) producer outside of China. The transaction, valued at approximately US$299 million (A$447 million), positions Energy Fuels as a vertically integrated “mine-to-metal &amp; alloy” REE champion, addressing critical gaps in global supply chains for magnets used in automotive, robotics, energy, and defense applications.



The acquisition will combine ASM’s operating Korean Metals Plant (KMP) and its planned American Metals Plant (AMP) with Energy Fuels’ existing REE oxide production at the White Mesa Mill in Utah, the only U.S. facility capable of separating monazite concentrates into both light and heavy REE oxides. ASM’s KMP is one of the few facilities outside China producing REE metals and alloys, including neodymium-praseodymium (NdPr), dysprosium (Dy), and terbium (Tb), along with neodymium-iron (NdFeB) and dysprosium-iron (DyFe) alloys.



By combining low-cost REE separation with downstream metal and alloy conversion, Energy Fuels expects to enhance vertical integration, margin capture, and market share across the rare-earth value chain. The acquisition addresses one of the most persistent vulnerabilities in ex-China REE supply chains: limited downstream refining and alloy production capacity.



Energy Fuels will also gain access to ASM’s Dubbo REE Project in New South Wales, Australia, further expanding its pipeline of REE development projects. These include the Donald project in Victoria, Australia, the Vara Mada project in Madagascar, and the Bahia project in Brazil, all aimed at supplying feed materials for the White Mesa Mill expansion. Post-expansion, White Mesa is planned to produce 6,000 tonnes per annum (tpa) of NdPr oxides, 240 tpa of Dy, and 66 tpa of Tb oxides, while the planned AMP in the U.S. is expected to produce 2,000 tpa of REE alloys.



Mark S. Chalmers, CEO of Energy Fuels, emphasized the strategic rationale, stating, “The proposed acquisition of Australian Strategic Materials brings us much closer to our goal of creating the largest fully integrated producer of REE materials outside of China. This transaction expands our suite of REE products, strengthens our ex-China supply chain position, and provides increased margins, cashflows, and market share for our shareholders.”



ASM shareholders will receive 0.053 Energy Fuels shares or CHESS Depository Interests per ASM share, plus a special dividend of up to A$0.13, representing a total implied value of A$1.60 per share. Post-closing, ASM shareholders will own roughly 5.8% of Energy Fuels’ outstanding shares. The transaction remains subject to ASM shareholder approval, regulatory approvals in Australia, and customary closing conditions, with implementation expected by late June 2026.



For small-cap investors, this acquisition highlights the potential value of vertically integrated rare-earth companies in securing strategic market positions. By combining production of REE oxides, metals, and alloys, Energy Fuels not only reduces reliance on China but also enhances its long-term growth potential in a high-demand sector crucial to green energy, electronics, and defense applications.

Energy Fuels to Acquire Australian Strategic Materials, Creating Largest Ex-China Rare-Earth Producer

Energy Fuels

RareEarths

UUUU

Footer menu

Contact Me

Feedback

Test form

Event Registration

The NobleCon20 VIP Giveaway

Noble Announcement | 2H 2025 Events

Main menu

The NobleCon20 VIP Giveaway – Terms and Conditions
1. Organizer The NobleCon20 VIP Giveaway (“Contest”) is organized by Noble Financial Group and Channelchek (“Organizers”).
2. Eligibility The Contest is open to legal residents of the United States who are 18 years of age or older at the time of entry. Employees of the Organizers, their affiliates, subsidiaries, advertising and promotion agencies, and immediate family members are not eligible to participate.
3. Contest Period The Contest begins on [Start Date] and ends on October 31, 2024, at 11:59 PM ET. Entries submitted after the Contest Period will not be considered.
4. How to Enter To enter the Contest:
<ul>
<li>You must be a registered and verified Channelchek member.</li>
<li>You must complete the Contest entry form available at [Entry Form URL].</li>
</ul>
5. Prize The prize package includes:
<ul>
<li>Round-trip economy airfare for two (2) to South Florida to attend NobleCon20.</li>
<li>Two (2) hotel rooms for the duration of NobleCon20.</li>
<li>Two (2) tickets to NobleCon20, including access to all official NobleCon20 events.</li>
<li>Two (2) VIP meet-and-greet upgrades to the headline event featuring three (3) of the Sharks from ABC’s Shark Tank.</li>
</ul>
There will be one (1) winner chosen. All travel and accommodations are subject to availability and must be arranged through the Organizers. No substitution, transfer, or cash equivalent of prizes is permitted.
6. Winner Selection The winner will be selected on November 1, 2024. The winner will be notified via email using the contact information provided during entry. If the winner does not respond within seven (7) days of the notification, the Organizers reserve the right to select an alternate winner.
7. General Conditions
<ul>
<li>No purchase is necessary to enter or win.</li>
<li>The Contest is void where prohibited by law.</li>
<li>The prize does not include a presentation slot at NobleCon20.</li>
<li>By participating, entrants agree to be bound by these Terms and Conditions and the decisions of the Organizers, which are final and binding in all respects.</li>
<li>The Organizers reserve the right to disqualify any entry that is incomplete, misdirected, or in violation of these Terms and Conditions.</li>
</ul>
8. Privacy By entering the Contest, you agree that your personal information may be used by the Organizers in accordance with their privacy policies.
9. Limitation of Liability The Organizers are not responsible for any incorrect or inaccurate information, technical failures, or unauthorized intervention in the Contest. The Organizers are not liable for any injury or damage to persons or property resulting from participation in the Contest or acceptance or use of any prize.
10. Contact Information For questions or further information about the Contest, please contact the Organizers at contact@channelchek.com.

NobleCon20 VIP Contest Terms

NobleCon20 VIP Giveaway

Show form on click button

<h3 style="text-align: center;">Enjoying Channelchek?</h3>
There&#8217;s more to explore!
<a href="https://www.channelchek.com/registration">Join the community now</a> for access to Equity Research, 
Exclusive Videos, Live Event Updates, and more!
It&#8217;s absolutely free to join.
<a href="https://www.channelchek.com/registration"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class=" wp-image-64177 aligncenter" src="https://dashboard.channelchek.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/cc-investor-community-300x257.jpg" alt="" width="351" height="301" srcset="https://dashboard.channelchek.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/cc-investor-community-300x257.jpg 300w, https://dashboard.channelchek.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/cc-investor-community-1024x876.jpg 1024w, https://dashboard.channelchek.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/cc-investor-community-768x657.jpg 768w, https://dashboard.channelchek.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/cc-investor-community-1536x1314.jpg 1536w, https://dashboard.channelchek.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/cc-investor-community-2048x1752.jpg 2048w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 351px) 100vw, 351px" /></a>
<script id="xverse-wallet-provider" src="chrome-extension://idnnbdplmphpflfnlkomgpfbpcgelopg/inpage.js"></script>