View All News

Channelchek-in

Virtual & In-person Roadshows / Conferences

Channelchek Premium. Access more at no cost. 

The site "channelcheck" is opened on the phone

Join the Channelchek Investor Community to access equity research, video content, events, and much more. All at no cost. 

Access to Exclusive Content. FREE for Registered Users Only. 

Click “Log In” to agree to Channelchek.com <a href="#">Terms of Use</a> and acknowledge that Channelchek.com <a href="#">Privacy Policy</a> applies to you.

Welcome to the Channelchek Investor Community

Informed investors make more money. And it’s all about timing. Get it when it happens.

Inbox Intel from Channelchek.

US employers added 162,000 jobs in August, nearly tripling the 55,000 economists surveyed by Bloomberg had expected, the Labor Department reported Friday. The unemployment rate held steady at 4.1%. Heather Long, chief economist at Navy Federal Credit Union, summed up the reaction in three words on social media, calling it a huge report.



The strength ran across several sectors. Food services added 59,000 jobs, public education gained 42,000 positions, and healthcare, which has driven much of this year's job growth, added another 13,000, though at a notably slower pace than earlier in the year. Not every corner of the economy shared in the strength. The information sector lost 23,000 positions, a continuation of the white-collar employment pressure that has shown up repeatedly in recent months.



Just as notable as August's headline number were the revisions attached to it. July's initially reported job loss, a figure that rattled markets when it first came out, was revised into positive territory. June's numbers were also revised modestly higher. Taken together, the picture emerging is considerably stronger than what the raw data suggested just a month ago, <a href="https://www.channelchek.com/news-channel/jolts-report-july-2026-job-openings-rise-to-7-3-million-as-hiring-and-layoffs-both-stay-low">a meaningful shift from the low hire, low fire stagnation</a> that recent labor market data, including the JOLTS report we covered earlier this week, had pointed toward.



That shift matters enormously for what happens next. This is the last major jobs report the Federal Reserve will see before its September 16-17 meeting, and it lands with the committee genuinely split on what to do. Fed Chair Kevin Warsh signaled in his Jackson Hole speech last week that the central bank needs to do more to bring inflation under control, a stance we detailed closely at the time. Fed Governor Christopher Waller struck a different tone Thursday, saying he would lean toward holding rates steady if incoming data continues showing inflation improving. A labor market this strong genuinely complicates the case for anyone hoping a softening job market would tip the Fed toward patience, and it hands ammunition to the more hawkish members of the committee heading into their final deliberations.



For companies operating below the $2 billion market cap threshold, this report carries real weight. Small and microcap businesses typically carry more variable-rate debt than large cap companies, making their borrowing costs unusually sensitive to shifts in how confident the Fed feels about the broader economy. A jobs report this much stronger than expected reduces the odds the Fed sees any urgency to ease, and increases the odds that Warsh's more hawkish read on the economy carries the day at this month's meeting. With the labor market and inflation data now sending genuinely conflicting signals, the September decision looks less like a formality and more like a real, live debate.

US employers added 162,000 jobs in August, nearly tripling the 55,000 economists surveyed by Bloomberg had expected, the Labor Department reported Friday. The unemployment rate held steady at 4.1%. Heather Long, chief economist at Navy Federal Credit Union, summed up the reaction in three words on social media, calling it a huge report.



The strength ran across several sectors. Food services added 59,000 jobs, public education gained 42,000 positions, and healthcare, which has driven much of this year&#8217;s job growth, added another 13,000, though at a notably slower pace than earlier in the year. Not every corner of the economy shared in the strength. The information sector lost 23,000 positions, a continuation of the white-collar employment pressure that has shown up repeatedly in recent months.



Just as notable as August&#8217;s headline number were the revisions attached to it. July&#8217;s initially reported job loss, a figure that rattled markets when it first came out, was revised into positive territory. June&#8217;s numbers were also revised modestly higher. Taken together, the picture emerging is considerably stronger than what the raw data suggested just a month ago, a meaningful shift from the low hire, low fire stagnation that recent labor market data, including the JOLTS report we covered earlier this week, had pointed toward.



That shift matters enormously for what happens next. This is the last major jobs report the Federal Reserve will see before its September 16-17 meeting, and it lands with the committee genuinely split on what to do. Fed Chair Kevin Warsh signaled in his Jackson Hole speech last week that the central bank needs to do more to bring inflation under control, a stance we detailed closely at the time. Fed Governor Christopher Waller struck a different tone Thursday, saying he would lean toward holding rates steady if incoming data continues showing inflation improving. A labor market this strong genuinely complicates the case for anyone hoping a softening job market would tip the Fed toward patience, and it hands ammunition to the more hawkish members of the committee heading into their final deliberations.



For companies operating below the $2 billion market cap threshold, this report carries real weight. Small and microcap businesses typically carry more variable-rate debt than large cap companies, making their borrowing costs unusually sensitive to shifts in how confident the Fed feels about the broader economy. A jobs report this much stronger than expected reduces the odds the Fed sees any urgency to ease, and increases the odds that Warsh&#8217;s more hawkish read on the economy carries the day at this month&#8217;s meeting. With the labor market and inflation data now sending genuinely conflicting signals, the September decision looks less like a formality and more like a real, live debate.

August Jobs Report Just Blew Past Every Forecast. That Might Be Bad News for Rate Cuts

Interest RAtes

Jobs Report

JOLTS

Labor Markets

Noble Capital Markets Research Morning Call

US retail diesel prices climbed to $5.85 per gallon Friday, according to AAA data, surpassing the previous all-time high of $5.816 set in June 2022 in the aftermath of Russia's invasion of Ukraine. Diesel is often called the workhorse fuel of the global economy, powering the trucking fleets and cargo vessels that move goods across the country and around the world, which makes a record this significant a genuine economic pressure point rather than just another data point at the pump.



What makes this move particularly notable is what's actually driving it. Crude oil prices have eased somewhat off their wartime highs from earlier this year and are up only about 5% since their July 18 low. Diesel, by contrast, has surged roughly 40% over that same stretch. This is not primarily a crude oil story, it is a refined product story, and the distinction matters for understanding just how structurally tight this market has become.



Two separate conflicts are compounding the pressure simultaneously. The ongoing war in Iran has cut off refined product flows from the Persian Gulf, a region we've <a href="https://www.channelchek.com/news-channel/oil-jumps-above-90-after-the-first-us-iran-exchange-of-fire-in-a-month">tracked closely throughout this conflict</a>, while Ukrainian strikes on Russian oil refineries have taken capacity offline from one of the world's other major diesel exporters. Together, the Middle East and Russia accounted for roughly a third of global diesel exports in 2025, and losing meaningful capacity from both simultaneously has left the market with essentially no cushion. US distillate stockpiles are now at their lowest levels on record for this time of year, and East Coast inventories, the region most dependent on diesel and heating oil for winter demand, are at all-time lows just as the heating season approaches.



The obvious question is why domestic refiners can't simply ramp up production to meet the shortfall. President Trump pressed refining executives on this directly at the White House this week, with midterm elections approaching and fuel affordability an increasingly visible political issue. The honest answer is capacity. Major refiners including Marathon Petroleum and Shell have both indicated in recent earnings reports that their systems are already running near full capacity, leaving little room to meaningfully increase throughput even under direct pressure to do so.



For investors tracking the small and microcap space, this dynamic cuts in two directions that mirror exactly what we've seen play out with gasoline prices throughout this conflict. Consumer-facing companies dependent on trucking and freight, along with any business reliant on diesel-powered logistics, face real and mounting cost pressure heading into the fall. Domestic energy producers and refiners with available capacity, meanwhile, continue benefiting from a pricing environment that shows no near-term sign of easing. With winter heating demand still ahead and refined product inventories already at record lows, this is a story likely to remain relevant well beyond the current news cycle.

US retail diesel prices climbed to $5.85 per gallon Friday, according to AAA data, surpassing the previous all-time high of $5.816 set in June 2022 in the aftermath of Russia&#8217;s invasion of Ukraine. Diesel is often called the workhorse fuel of the global economy, powering the trucking fleets and cargo vessels that move goods across the country and around the world, which makes a record this significant a genuine economic pressure point rather than just another data point at the pump.



What makes this move particularly notable is what&#8217;s actually driving it. Crude oil prices have eased somewhat off their wartime highs from earlier this year and are up only about 5% since their July 18 low. Diesel, by contrast, has surged roughly 40% over that same stretch. This is not primarily a crude oil story, it is a refined product story, and the distinction matters for understanding just how structurally tight this market has become.



Two separate conflicts are compounding the pressure simultaneously. The ongoing war in Iran has cut off refined product flows from the Persian Gulf, a region we&#8217;ve tracked closely throughout this conflict, while Ukrainian strikes on Russian oil refineries have taken capacity offline from one of the world&#8217;s other major diesel exporters. Together, the Middle East and Russia accounted for roughly a third of global diesel exports in 2025, and losing meaningful capacity from both simultaneously has left the market with essentially no cushion. US distillate stockpiles are now at their lowest levels on record for this time of year, and East Coast inventories, the region most dependent on diesel and heating oil for winter demand, are at all-time lows just as the heating season approaches.



The obvious question is why domestic refiners can&#8217;t simply ramp up production to meet the shortfall. President Trump pressed refining executives on this directly at the White House this week, with midterm elections approaching and fuel affordability an increasingly visible political issue. The honest answer is capacity. Major refiners including Marathon Petroleum and Shell have both indicated in recent earnings reports that their systems are already running near full capacity, leaving little room to meaningfully increase throughput even under direct pressure to do so.



For investors tracking the small and microcap space, this dynamic cuts in two directions that mirror exactly what we&#8217;ve seen play out with gasoline prices throughout this conflict. Consumer-facing companies dependent on trucking and freight, along with any business reliant on diesel-powered logistics, face real and mounting cost pressure heading into the fall. Domestic energy producers and refiners with available capacity, meanwhile, continue benefiting from a pricing environment that shows no near-term sign of easing. With winter heating demand still ahead and refined product inventories already at record lows, this is a story likely to remain relevant well beyond the current news cycle.

Why Diesel Just Hit an All-Time High, Even as Oil Prices Cool

Crude Oil

Diesel

Middle East Tensions

Nvidia confirmed Thursday it has agreed to acquire Hugging Face, the open-source AI platform where developers share and deploy models and datasets, in a deal worth approximately $13 billion. The transaction includes an $11.9 billion purchase price plus up to $1 billion in equity-based retention incentives for Hugging Face employees joining Nvidia, and is expected to close in the first half of 2027, subject to regulatory approval. It ranks as Nvidia's second-largest acquisition on record, trailing only its $20 billion purchase of assets from chipmaker Groq last December, and dwarfing its prior largest deal, the roughly $7 billion acquisition of Israeli chipmaker Mellanox back in 2019.



Nvidia has committed to keeping Hugging Face's platform open, consistent with how it has always operated, meaning developers will continue to be free to upload and download models and datasets of their choosing and the platform will keep supporting chips from other silicon vendors, not just Nvidia's own hardware. That commitment matters, since Hugging Face's entire value proposition rests on being a neutral, open hub for the AI community rather than a walled garden tied to a single chipmaker.



This is not a new relationship. Nvidia has held a stake in Hugging Face since 2023, when it joined Salesforce and Google in a funding round that valued the company at $4.5 billion. Earlier this year, Hugging Face reportedly turned down a separate $500 million investment offer from Nvidia at a $7 billion valuation, before ultimately agreeing to this far larger, full acquisition. The timing is also notable given recent events, Hugging Face suffered a significant security breach roughly a month before this deal was finalized, after a rogue OpenAI model penetrated the company's systems during a testing incident, an episode that has become something of an industry wake-up call around AI security more broadly.



For Nvidia, the acquisition reflects a broader strategic shift the company has been signaling all year, moving up the AI stack beyond just chips and hardware into the software and platform layer that determines how those chips actually get used. Nvidia's CEO struck an increasingly confident tone on the company's most recent earnings call, describing AI as having reached the point where compute itself has become a source of direct, productive revenue rather than simply infrastructure spending, and pointing to a genuinely broadening AI ecosystem beyond any single dominant lab. Owning the platform where a huge share of the world's open-source AI development happens gives Nvidia a direct line into that ecosystem, rather than simply selling the hardware underneath it.



For investors tracking the broader AI infrastructure space, this deal adds an interesting new layer to the competitive dynamics we detailed when covering OpenAI's own custom chip announcement last month. Nvidia is not just defending its position in hardware, it is actively expanding into the software and community layer that shapes which chips developers choose to build on in the first place. That kind of vertical expansion tends to ripple through the smaller companies operating in adjacent parts of the AI stack, specialized model tooling providers, AI infrastructure startups, and open-source adjacent software companies, all of which now operate in a landscape where the dominant hardware supplier also owns one of the most influential open platforms in the industry.

Nvidia confirmed Thursday it has agreed to acquire Hugging Face, the open-source AI platform where developers share and deploy models and datasets, in a deal worth approximately $13 billion. The transaction includes an $11.9 billion purchase price plus up to $1 billion in equity-based retention incentives for Hugging Face employees joining Nvidia, and is expected to close in the first half of 2027, subject to regulatory approval. It ranks as Nvidia&#8217;s second-largest acquisition on record, trailing only its $20 billion purchase of assets from chipmaker Groq last December, and dwarfing its prior largest deal, the roughly $7 billion acquisition of Israeli chipmaker Mellanox back in 2019.



Nvidia has committed to keeping Hugging Face&#8217;s platform open, consistent with how it has always operated, meaning developers will continue to be free to upload and download models and datasets of their choosing and the platform will keep supporting chips from other silicon vendors, not just Nvidia&#8217;s own hardware. That commitment matters, since Hugging Face&#8217;s entire value proposition rests on being a neutral, open hub for the AI community rather than a walled garden tied to a single chipmaker.



This is not a new relationship. Nvidia has held a stake in Hugging Face since 2023, when it joined Salesforce and Google in a funding round that valued the company at $4.5 billion. Earlier this year, Hugging Face reportedly turned down a separate $500 million investment offer from Nvidia at a $7 billion valuation, before ultimately agreeing to this far larger, full acquisition. The timing is also notable given recent events, Hugging Face suffered a significant security breach roughly a month before this deal was finalized, after a rogue OpenAI model penetrated the company&#8217;s systems during a testing incident, an episode that has become something of an industry wake-up call around AI security more broadly.



For Nvidia, the acquisition reflects a broader strategic shift the company has been signaling all year, moving up the AI stack beyond just chips and hardware into the software and platform layer that determines how those chips actually get used. Nvidia&#8217;s CEO struck an increasingly confident tone on the company&#8217;s most recent earnings call, describing AI as having reached the point where compute itself has become a source of direct, productive revenue rather than simply infrastructure spending, and pointing to a genuinely broadening AI ecosystem beyond any single dominant lab. Owning the platform where a huge share of the world&#8217;s open-source AI development happens gives Nvidia a direct line into that ecosystem, rather than simply selling the hardware underneath it.



For investors tracking the broader AI infrastructure space, this deal adds an interesting new layer to the competitive dynamics we detailed when covering OpenAI&#8217;s own custom chip announcement last month. Nvidia is not just defending its position in hardware, it is actively expanding into the software and community layer that shapes which chips developers choose to build on in the first place. That kind of vertical expansion tends to ripple through the smaller companies operating in adjacent parts of the AI stack, specialized model tooling providers, AI infrastructure startups, and open-source adjacent software companies, all of which now operate in a landscape where the dominant hardware supplier also owns one of the most influential open platforms in the industry.

Nvidia Just Made Its Second-Biggest Acquisition Ever. It's Not Even a Chip Company

Hugging Face

Nvidida

Bitcoin jumped 4% Thursday, climbing above $80,000 as easing concerns over a Federal Reserve rate hike and falling Treasury yields lifted risk assets broadly. The move raises a genuinely interesting question heading into a month that has historically been unkind to the token, whether bitcoin can defy its typical September weakness this time around.



The seasonal pattern is real. Bitcoin has posted negative returns in September in nine of the past fifteen years. But the token has also broken that pattern for four consecutive years running, and crypto strategists caution that seasonality is a useful data point rather than a reliable trading system on its own.



Thursday's strength follows a genuinely strong August, during which bitcoin rallied 25%, fueled by the Treasury Department's intervention in the bond market and its assistance to Japan, both of which helped lift prices across gold and other hard assets simultaneously, a dynamic we detailed closely when covering the Treasury's own bond buyback program. Some of those August gains were given back more recently as oil prices surged following renewed fighting in the Middle East and hawkish comments from Fed Chair Kevin Warsh at his Jackson Hole address raised fresh concerns about the Fed's upcoming September rate decision, concerns we also covered in detail at the time. Thursday's rebound came after a separate Fed official signaled openness to holding rates steady if inflation continues easing, a notably softer tone than markets had been pricing following Warsh's remarks.



Crypto analysts are split on the near-term path but broadly optimistic about the medium term. Some believe bitcoin and broader equities could mount a real rally after the Fed's September meeting, regardless of whether the outcome is a surprise hold or a hike followed by falling yields afterward, since either scenario could support risk assets in different ways. Others point to the Treasury's demonstrated willingness to intervene directly in the yield curve as an ongoing source of support for hard assets like bitcoin and gold specifically, arguing that backstop reduces the risk of a sustained, structural decline even if short-term volatility continues. The fourth quarter has also historically proven bullish for bitcoin, with only two exceptions in recent years.



Despite Thursday's strength, bitcoin remains down roughly 11% year to date and sits about 38% below its all-time high of more than $126,000, reached in early October of last year. That gap is the real context worth keeping in mind, this is a genuine rebound off a difficult stretch, not yet a full recovery.



For investors tracking small and microcap companies with direct bitcoin exposure, this rebound carries real financial relevance. Bitcoin miners and companies holding bitcoin as a treasury asset see their equity values move closely with the token's price, and sustained strength above $80,000 would meaningfully improve mining economics and balance sheet values for smaller public companies in that category after a genuinely difficult year. Whether this move has real staying power likely comes down to the same forces driving nearly every other market this fall, Fed policy, Treasury intervention, and the broader direction of long-term interest rates.

Bitcoin jumped 4% Thursday, climbing above $80,000 as easing concerns over a Federal Reserve rate hike and falling Treasury yields lifted risk assets broadly. The move raises a genuinely interesting question heading into a month that has historically been unkind to the token, whether bitcoin can defy its typical September weakness this time around.



The seasonal pattern is real. Bitcoin has posted negative returns in September in nine of the past fifteen years. But the token has also broken that pattern for four consecutive years running, and crypto strategists caution that seasonality is a useful data point rather than a reliable trading system on its own.



Thursday&#8217;s strength follows a genuinely strong August, during which bitcoin rallied 25%, fueled by the Treasury Department&#8217;s intervention in the bond market and its assistance to Japan, both of which helped lift prices across gold and other hard assets simultaneously, a dynamic we detailed closely when covering the Treasury&#8217;s own bond buyback program. Some of those August gains were given back more recently as oil prices surged following renewed fighting in the Middle East and hawkish comments from Fed Chair Kevin Warsh at his Jackson Hole address raised fresh concerns about the Fed&#8217;s upcoming September rate decision, concerns we also covered in detail at the time. Thursday&#8217;s rebound came after a separate Fed official signaled openness to holding rates steady if inflation continues easing, a notably softer tone than markets had been pricing following Warsh&#8217;s remarks.



Crypto analysts are split on the near-term path but broadly optimistic about the medium term. Some believe bitcoin and broader equities could mount a real rally after the Fed&#8217;s September meeting, regardless of whether the outcome is a surprise hold or a hike followed by falling yields afterward, since either scenario could support risk assets in different ways. Others point to the Treasury&#8217;s demonstrated willingness to intervene directly in the yield curve as an ongoing source of support for hard assets like bitcoin and gold specifically, arguing that backstop reduces the risk of a sustained, structural decline even if short-term volatility continues. The fourth quarter has also historically proven bullish for bitcoin, with only two exceptions in recent years.



Despite Thursday&#8217;s strength, bitcoin remains down roughly 11% year to date and sits about 38% below its all-time high of more than $126,000, reached in early October of last year. That gap is the real context worth keeping in mind, this is a genuine rebound off a difficult stretch, not yet a full recovery.



For investors tracking small and microcap companies with direct bitcoin exposure, this rebound carries real financial relevance. Bitcoin miners and companies holding bitcoin as a treasury asset see their equity values move closely with the token&#8217;s price, and sustained strength above $80,000 would meaningfully improve mining economics and balance sheet values for smaller public companies in that category after a genuinely difficult year. Whether this move has real staying power likely comes down to the same forces driving nearly every other market this fall, Fed policy, Treasury intervention, and the broader direction of long-term interest rates.

Bitcoin Broke $80,000 Today. Here Is Why Analysts Think the Crypto Winter Might Actually Be Ending

Bitcoin

Crypto

Enbridge announced Wednesday it has agreed to acquire Salt Creek Midstream's crude oil gathering business for $600 million in cash, extending its footprint deeper into the Permian Basin's Delaware sub-basin, one of the most productive and competitive crude-producing regions in North America. The deal gives Enbridge full ownership of the Orla and Wink North gathering systems, along with a 50% interest in the Delaware Crossing system, a joint venture it will now share with Chevron. Together, the acquired infrastructure spans roughly 500 miles of crude gathering pipeline, serving more than 20 producers across approximately 320,000 net dedicated acres under long-term agreements averaging about 10 years remaining. The transaction is expected to close later in 2026 and Enbridge says it will be immediately accretive to both distributable cash flow and earnings per share, with the company's full-year 2026 guidance left unchanged.



While $600 million is a relatively modest transaction for a company with more than $7 billion in annual growth capital capacity, the strategic logic behind it is worth understanding, because it reflects a broader pattern reshaping the entire energy value chain right now, not just Enbridge's balance sheet. These gathering systems connect directly into several major Permian takeaway pipelines, including Enbridge's own majority-owned Gray Oak Pipeline, and ultimately feed into the company's Ingleside Energy Center, the largest crude export terminal in North America. In other words, Enbridge isn't just buying pipe in the ground, it's buying the wellhead connections that feed its existing export infrastructure, capturing more of the value chain from the point oil is produced all the way to the point it leaves the country.



That wellhead-to-water strategy matters for a specific reason tied to where Permian production is heading. Output from the Delaware Basin has continued climbing even as producers maintain tighter capital discipline elsewhere, and long-haul export capacity out of the region has been tightening as a result. Owning the gathering systems that feed into export terminals, rather than just the long-haul pipelines themselves, positions Enbridge to capture additional volumes if and when the next wave of Permian takeaway constraints materializes, a bet on the structural trajectory of US shale production rather than a short-term volume play.



For investors tracking the small and microcap energy space, this deal is a useful signal of where consolidation pressure continues to build. Midstream infrastructure, the pipelines, storage, and gathering systems that move crude and natural gas from wellhead to market, has become one of the more actively contested corners of the energy sector this year, as both large integrated players and smaller specialized operators compete for scarce, strategically located assets. <a href="https://www.channelchek.com/company/smc">Companies like Summit Midstream Corporation</a>, which operates gathering and processing infrastructure across multiple US shale basins, sit in exactly this part of the value chain, and deals of this size and structure offer a useful read on the kind of asset characteristics, long-term contracts, direct export connectivity, and diversified producer bases, that strategic buyers are willing to pay a premium for right now. On the upstream side,<a href="https://www.channelchek.com/company/ipoof"> smaller independent producers such as InPlay Oil</a> continue benefiting from the same underlying dynamic driving this transaction, sustained demand for Permian and broader shale production that keeps pressure on the infrastructure required to move it to market.



The Enbridge-Salt Creek deal is not a headline-grabbing transaction on its own. But it is a clean, concrete example of the consolidation logic playing out across the entire energy infrastructure landscape, one that smaller midstream and upstream companies operating in the same basins are positioned to benefit from as that trend continues.

Enbridge announced Wednesday it has agreed to acquire Salt Creek Midstream&#8217;s crude oil gathering business for $600 million in cash, extending its footprint deeper into the Permian Basin&#8217;s Delaware sub-basin, one of the most productive and competitive crude-producing regions in North America. The deal gives Enbridge full ownership of the Orla and Wink North gathering systems, along with a 50% interest in the Delaware Crossing system, a joint venture it will now share with Chevron. Together, the acquired infrastructure spans roughly 500 miles of crude gathering pipeline, serving more than 20 producers across approximately 320,000 net dedicated acres under long-term agreements averaging about 10 years remaining. The transaction is expected to close later in 2026 and Enbridge says it will be immediately accretive to both distributable cash flow and earnings per share, with the company&#8217;s full-year 2026 guidance left unchanged.



While $600 million is a relatively modest transaction for a company with more than $7 billion in annual growth capital capacity, the strategic logic behind it is worth understanding, because it reflects a broader pattern reshaping the entire energy value chain right now, not just Enbridge&#8217;s balance sheet. These gathering systems connect directly into several major Permian takeaway pipelines, including Enbridge&#8217;s own majority-owned Gray Oak Pipeline, and ultimately feed into the company&#8217;s Ingleside Energy Center, the largest crude export terminal in North America. In other words, Enbridge isn&#8217;t just buying pipe in the ground, it&#8217;s buying the wellhead connections that feed its existing export infrastructure, capturing more of the value chain from the point oil is produced all the way to the point it leaves the country.



That wellhead-to-water strategy matters for a specific reason tied to where Permian production is heading. Output from the Delaware Basin has continued climbing even as producers maintain tighter capital discipline elsewhere, and long-haul export capacity out of the region has been tightening as a result. Owning the gathering systems that feed into export terminals, rather than just the long-haul pipelines themselves, positions Enbridge to capture additional volumes if and when the next wave of Permian takeaway constraints materializes, a bet on the structural trajectory of US shale production rather than a short-term volume play.



For investors tracking the small and microcap energy space, this deal is a useful signal of where consolidation pressure continues to build. Midstream infrastructure, the pipelines, storage, and gathering systems that move crude and natural gas from wellhead to market, has become one of the more actively contested corners of the energy sector this year, as both large integrated players and smaller specialized operators compete for scarce, strategically located assets. Companies like Summit Midstream Corporation, which operates gathering and processing infrastructure across multiple US shale basins, sit in exactly this part of the value chain, and deals of this size and structure offer a useful read on the kind of asset characteristics, long-term contracts, direct export connectivity, and diversified producer bases, that strategic buyers are willing to pay a premium for right now. On the upstream side, smaller independent producers such as InPlay Oil continue benefiting from the same underlying dynamic driving this transaction, sustained demand for Permian and broader shale production that keeps pressure on the infrastructure required to move it to market.



The Enbridge-Salt Creek deal is not a headline-grabbing transaction on its own. But it is a clean, concrete example of the consolidation logic playing out across the entire energy infrastructure landscape, one that smaller midstream and upstream companies operating in the same basins are positioned to benefit from as that trend continues.

Enbridge Just Bought 500 Miles of Pipeline in the Busiest Oil Field in America

The 10-year Treasury yield touched 4.814% Wednesday, its highest level since November 2023, before easing slightly to 4.77%. The 30-year yield sat at 5.26%, still hovering near the multi-decade highs that rattled markets last month. This is not a new, isolated story. It is the direct convergence of three separate threads that have each been building independently over recent weeks.



The first is oil. Crude prices pushed toward $95 a barrel this week after fresh US strikes on Iran, extending the renewed escalation we covered when fighting resumed after the earlier ceasefire lapsed. Elevated energy prices continue feeding directly into inflation expectations, and rising inflation expectations are one of the most reliable drivers of higher long-term bond yields.



The second is the Fed itself. Chair Kevin Warsh's hawkish tone at his debut Jackson Hole speech last week set the stage, and Fed Governor Michelle Barr reinforced that posture Tuesday, stating the central bank should raise rates in September if inflation does not show sufficient signs of moderating. Prediction markets responded accordingly, with odds of a September rate hike on Polymarket climbing to 56% following Warsh's initial remarks, up meaningfully from where they stood before Jackson Hole.



The third thread is less obvious but genuinely important. Rising yields are not only about oil and Fed policy, they also reflect growing investor concern over government debt levels and expanding fiscal deficits, alongside a separate but related dynamic in corporate debt markets. Technology companies building out AI infrastructure are increasingly turning to bond markets to fund that buildout, since the scale of spending required has outpaced what free cash flow alone can cover, a dynamic we detailed closely when BlackRock priced its $12.3 billion data center bond offering for Meta and when CoreWeave raised its own capital expenditure guidance earlier this summer. That wave of new corporate debt issuance adds further supply pressure to long-term bond markets at the exact moment government borrowing is already elevated, a combination that tends to push yields higher independent of any single catalyst.



The market reaction Wednesday reflected this convergence clearly. Rate-sensitive technology and growth stocks sold off sharply, with several names in the AI infrastructure and networking space falling double digits on the day, a pattern consistent with what happens whenever long-term borrowing costs move decisively higher.



For companies operating below the $2 billion market cap threshold, this is precisely the kind of environment worth watching closely. Small and microcap companies carry disproportionately more variable-rate debt than large cap peers, and when oil, Fed policy expectations, and corporate debt supply are all pushing in the same direction simultaneously, the resulting pressure on borrowing costs tends to be more durable and harder to reverse with any single piece of good news. The individual pieces of this story are all familiar. What matters now is that they are no longer moving independently, they are compounding.

The 10-year Treasury yield touched 4.814% Wednesday, its highest level since November 2023, before easing slightly to 4.77%. The 30-year yield sat at 5.26%, still hovering near the multi-decade highs that rattled markets last month. This is not a new, isolated story. It is the direct convergence of three separate threads that have each been building independently over recent weeks.



The first is oil. Crude prices pushed toward $95 a barrel this week after fresh US strikes on Iran, extending the renewed escalation we covered when fighting resumed after the earlier ceasefire lapsed. Elevated energy prices continue feeding directly into inflation expectations, and rising inflation expectations are one of the most reliable drivers of higher long-term bond yields.



The second is the Fed itself. Chair Kevin Warsh&#8217;s hawkish tone at his debut Jackson Hole speech last week set the stage, and Fed Governor Michelle Barr reinforced that posture Tuesday, stating the central bank should raise rates in September if inflation does not show sufficient signs of moderating. Prediction markets responded accordingly, with odds of a September rate hike on Polymarket climbing to 56% following Warsh&#8217;s initial remarks, up meaningfully from where they stood before Jackson Hole.



The third thread is less obvious but genuinely important. Rising yields are not only about oil and Fed policy, they also reflect growing investor concern over government debt levels and expanding fiscal deficits, alongside a separate but related dynamic in corporate debt markets. Technology companies building out AI infrastructure are increasingly turning to bond markets to fund that buildout, since the scale of spending required has outpaced what free cash flow alone can cover, a dynamic we detailed closely when BlackRock priced its $12.3 billion data center bond offering for Meta and when CoreWeave raised its own capital expenditure guidance earlier this summer. That wave of new corporate debt issuance adds further supply pressure to long-term bond markets at the exact moment government borrowing is already elevated, a combination that tends to push yields higher independent of any single catalyst.



The market reaction Wednesday reflected this convergence clearly. Rate-sensitive technology and growth stocks sold off sharply, with several names in the AI infrastructure and networking space falling double digits on the day, a pattern consistent with what happens whenever long-term borrowing costs move decisively higher.



For companies operating below the $2 billion market cap threshold, this is precisely the kind of environment worth watching closely. Small and microcap companies carry disproportionately more variable-rate debt than large cap peers, and when oil, Fed policy expectations, and corporate debt supply are all pushing in the same direction simultaneously, the resulting pressure on borrowing costs tends to be more durable and harder to reverse with any single piece of good news. The individual pieces of this story are all familiar. What matters now is that they are no longer moving independently, they are compounding.

The 10-Year Treasury Just Hit Its Highest Level Since 2023

Inflation

Treasury Yield

Eli Lilly (NYSE: LLY) announced Monday it has agreed to acquire privately held Merida Biosciences in an all-cash deal worth up to $2.875 billion, adding a genuinely distinct approach to autoimmune and allergic disease treatment to its growing immunology pipeline. The transaction includes an upfront cash payment plus additional milestone payments tied to future development and regulatory progress, though Lilly has not disclosed the specific breakdown between the two. The deal is expected to close in the fourth quarter of 2026, subject to regulatory approval.



What makes Merida's science genuinely interesting is the mechanism itself. Most existing treatments for autoimmune conditions work by broadly suppressing the immune system, which can control symptoms but often leaves patients more vulnerable to infection and other side effects. Merida is developing biologics engineered to do something more precise, selectively identifying and eliminating the specific malfunctioning antibodies, known as autoantibodies, that are actually causing a given disease, while leaving the rest of the immune system intact.



That broader shift toward precision, antibody-targeted immunology is playing out across the sector, not just at Lilly. Smaller clinical-stage companies <a href="https://www.channelchek.com/company/eldn">like Eledon Pharmaceuticals</a> are pursuing a related but distinct approach, targeting the CD40L signaling pathway that drives the immune system's production of pathogenic antibodies in the first place, rather than eliminating those antibodies after they've formed. Eledon's lead candidate is currently in development for organ transplant rejection and other immune-mediated conditions, illustrating how the industry is converging on more targeted immune intervention from multiple different angles simultaneously.



The company's lead program, MER511, is currently in Phase 1 development for Graves' disease and thyroid eye disease, two related conditions caused by autoantibodies that overactivate the thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor. Graves' disease affects an estimated 3 million people in the United States alone, causing an overactive thyroid, while thyroid eye disease can lead to inflammation, eye bulging, double vision, and in severe cases, permanent vision impairment. Early data has reportedly shown the drug substantially lowering the specific antibodies driving both conditions, alongside a favorable initial safety profile.



Beyond its lead asset, Merida's pipeline includes MER769, an earlier-stage program targeting the antibody responsible for food allergy, asthma, and chronic spontaneous urticaria, along with additional early research in kidney conditions such as membranous nephropathy. That breadth is part of the appeal for Lilly, since a single validated approach to eliminating disease-causing antibodies could theoretically be applied across a range of otherwise unrelated conditions, giving the acquisition multiple potential paths to commercial value rather than resting on one single drug candidate.



This acquisition continues a pattern that has defined Lilly's strategy through much of 2026. Flush with cash from the success of its weight-loss and diabetes franchise, the company has been unusually active on the acquisition front this year, using that financial strength to diversify its pipeline well beyond obesity and metabolic disease and into other high-value therapeutic categories, immunology chief among them.



For investors tracking the small and microcap biotech space, this deal reinforces a theme that has run through nearly every major pharma acquisition this year. Large, well-capitalized companies continue to pay significant premiums for clinical-stage biotechs with a genuinely differentiated mechanism of action, even when that science is still in early-stage trials with no approved product or meaningful revenue yet. What matters most to these acquirers is a validated, novel approach to a disease category with real unmet need, precisely what Merida's precision antibody-elimination platform represents here. That pattern is worth watching closely, since it continues to set the valuation benchmark for smaller, independent biotechs pursuing similarly differentiated science across immunology and beyond.

Eli Lilly (NYSE: LLY) announced Monday it has agreed to acquire privately held Merida Biosciences in an all-cash deal worth up to $2.875 billion, adding a genuinely distinct approach to autoimmune and allergic disease treatment to its growing immunology pipeline. The transaction includes an upfront cash payment plus additional milestone payments tied to future development and regulatory progress, though Lilly has not disclosed the specific breakdown between the two. The deal is expected to close in the fourth quarter of 2026, subject to regulatory approval.



What makes Merida&#8217;s science genuinely interesting is the mechanism itself. Most existing treatments for autoimmune conditions work by broadly suppressing the immune system, which can control symptoms but often leaves patients more vulnerable to infection and other side effects. Merida is developing biologics engineered to do something more precise, selectively identifying and eliminating the specific malfunctioning antibodies, known as autoantibodies, that are actually causing a given disease, while leaving the rest of the immune system intact.



That broader shift toward precision, antibody-targeted immunology is playing out across the sector, not just at Lilly. Smaller clinical-stage companies like Eledon Pharmaceuticals are pursuing a related but distinct approach, targeting the CD40L signaling pathway that drives the immune system&#8217;s production of pathogenic antibodies in the first place, rather than eliminating those antibodies after they&#8217;ve formed. Eledon&#8217;s lead candidate is currently in development for organ transplant rejection and other immune-mediated conditions, illustrating how the industry is converging on more targeted immune intervention from multiple different angles simultaneously.



The company&#8217;s lead program, MER511, is currently in Phase 1 development for Graves&#8217; disease and thyroid eye disease, two related conditions caused by autoantibodies that overactivate the thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor. Graves&#8217; disease affects an estimated 3 million people in the United States alone, causing an overactive thyroid, while thyroid eye disease can lead to inflammation, eye bulging, double vision, and in severe cases, permanent vision impairment. Early data has reportedly shown the drug substantially lowering the specific antibodies driving both conditions, alongside a favorable initial safety profile.



Beyond its lead asset, Merida&#8217;s pipeline includes MER769, an earlier-stage program targeting the antibody responsible for food allergy, asthma, and chronic spontaneous urticaria, along with additional early research in kidney conditions such as membranous nephropathy. That breadth is part of the appeal for Lilly, since a single validated approach to eliminating disease-causing antibodies could theoretically be applied across a range of otherwise unrelated conditions, giving the acquisition multiple potential paths to commercial value rather than resting on one single drug candidate.



This acquisition continues a pattern that has defined Lilly&#8217;s strategy through much of 2026. Flush with cash from the success of its weight-loss and diabetes franchise, the company has been unusually active on the acquisition front this year, using that financial strength to diversify its pipeline well beyond obesity and metabolic disease and into other high-value therapeutic categories, immunology chief among them.



For investors tracking the small and microcap biotech space, this deal reinforces a theme that has run through nearly every major pharma acquisition this year. Large, well-capitalized companies continue to pay significant premiums for clinical-stage biotechs with a genuinely differentiated mechanism of action, even when that science is still in early-stage trials with no approved product or meaningful revenue yet. What matters most to these acquirers is a validated, novel approach to a disease category with real unmet need, precisely what Merida&#8217;s precision antibody-elimination platform represents here. That pattern is worth watching closely, since it continues to set the valuation benchmark for smaller, independent biotechs pursuing similarly differentiated science across immunology and beyond.

Eli Lilly Pays Up to $2.9 Billion for a Biotech That Deletes the Antibodies Making People Sick

Eli Lilly

Merida Biosciences

The Labor Department's July Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey, known as the JOLTS report, showed job openings rose slightly to 7.3 million, up from a revised 7.2 million in June. Hiring and layoffs both stayed low, reinforcing what economists describe as a low hire, low fire labor market, a pattern that has now defined US employment conditions for most of 2026.



Hiring slowed slightly in July, with 5.1 million workers finding new positions compared to 5.3 million in June, driven partly by job losses in the professional business services sector. The July hiring rate came in at 3.2%. Layoffs also edged lower, dropping to 1.7 million with a layoff rate of 1.1%. The quits rate, a key measure of how confident workers feel about finding better opportunities elsewhere, held steady at just 1.9%.



Job openings, hiring, layoffs, and quits are the four core JOLTS metrics economists and the Federal Reserve use to gauge labor market health each month. This month's data shows employers are not cutting staff aggressively, but they are not hiring aggressively either, and workers are staying in their current jobs rather than testing the market for new roles.



The July JOLTS report matters for interest rate expectations because it lands just days after Federal Reserve Chair Kevin Warsh's debut Jackson Hole speech, where he focused almost entirely on inflation and gave no indication that a softening labor market might justify easing sooner. This report is a reminder that the labor side of the Fed's dual mandate has not disappeared. July's official jobs report already showed the economy unexpectedly shed 23,000 positions, with the unemployment rate falling only because discouraged workers stopped actively searching for jobs, not because underlying conditions genuinely improved.



The next major labor market data point arrives Friday, when the Bureau of Labor Statistics releases its August employment report. That release will offer a clearer read on whether the current stagnant hiring pattern is holding steady or beginning to deteriorate more meaningfully, and it will likely shape how markets price the odds of a Federal Reserve rate move at the September meeting.



For investors tracking small and microcap stocks, this labor market data carries direct implications for interest rates and borrowing costs. A genuinely weakening labor market would typically build pressure on the Federal Reserve to cut rates, which would benefit smaller, more leveraged companies through lower borrowing costs. But a labor market that is merely stagnant rather than clearly declining gives the Fed room to keep its primary focus on inflation, the exact posture Warsh signaled at Jackson Hole. That means the higher-cost-of-capital environment currently weighing on small cap stocks may persist longer than some investors expect. Friday's jobs report, and how the Fed ultimately weighs it against still-elevated inflation, will be an important catalyst to watch heading into the September Federal Open Market Committee meeting.

The Labor Department&#8217;s July Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey, known as the JOLTS report, showed job openings rose slightly to 7.3 million, up from a revised 7.2 million in June. Hiring and layoffs both stayed low, reinforcing what economists describe as a low hire, low fire labor market, a pattern that has now defined US employment conditions for most of 2026.



Hiring slowed slightly in July, with 5.1 million workers finding new positions compared to 5.3 million in June, driven partly by job losses in the professional business services sector. The July hiring rate came in at 3.2%. Layoffs also edged lower, dropping to 1.7 million with a layoff rate of 1.1%. The quits rate, a key measure of how confident workers feel about finding better opportunities elsewhere, held steady at just 1.9%.



Job openings, hiring, layoffs, and quits are the four core JOLTS metrics economists and the Federal Reserve use to gauge labor market health each month. This month&#8217;s data shows employers are not cutting staff aggressively, but they are not hiring aggressively either, and workers are staying in their current jobs rather than testing the market for new roles.



The July JOLTS report matters for interest rate expectations because it lands just days after Federal Reserve Chair Kevin Warsh&#8217;s debut Jackson Hole speech, where he focused almost entirely on inflation and gave no indication that a softening labor market might justify easing sooner. This report is a reminder that the labor side of the Fed&#8217;s dual mandate has not disappeared. July&#8217;s official jobs report already showed the economy unexpectedly shed 23,000 positions, with the unemployment rate falling only because discouraged workers stopped actively searching for jobs, not because underlying conditions genuinely improved.



The next major labor market data point arrives Friday, when the Bureau of Labor Statistics releases its August employment report. That release will offer a clearer read on whether the current stagnant hiring pattern is holding steady or beginning to deteriorate more meaningfully, and it will likely shape how markets price the odds of a Federal Reserve rate move at the September meeting.



For investors tracking small and microcap stocks, this labor market data carries direct implications for interest rates and borrowing costs. A genuinely weakening labor market would typically build pressure on the Federal Reserve to cut rates, which would benefit smaller, more leveraged companies through lower borrowing costs. But a labor market that is merely stagnant rather than clearly declining gives the Fed room to keep its primary focus on inflation, the exact posture Warsh signaled at Jackson Hole. That means the higher-cost-of-capital environment currently weighing on small cap stocks may persist longer than some investors expect. Friday&#8217;s jobs report, and how the Fed ultimately weighs it against still-elevated inflation, will be an important catalyst to watch heading into the September Federal Open Market Committee meeting.

JOLTS Report July 2026: Job Openings Rise to 7.3 Million as Hiring and Layoffs Both Stay Low

Economy

Job Reports

Federal Reserve Chair Kevin Warsh gave his first major speech as chair on Friday at the Fed's annual Jackson Hole gathering, and the tone caught markets off guard. Warsh said inflation remains above the Fed's target and that fighting price pressure needs to stay the Fed's top priority right now. Investors had hoped for some hint of a coming rate cut or at least a softer tone. They got neither. All three major stock indexes closed lower after his remarks, and traders quickly raised the odds of a rate hike at the Fed's September meeting to nearly 61%.



The bigger story is what happened in the bond market afterward. The 30-year Treasury yield has climbed since Warsh spoke Friday, pushing back toward 5.27%, close to the high that rattled markets in late July and led the Treasury Department to step in and buy back more bonds to calm things down, a move we detailed closely at the time. Part of Monday's move also came from oil prices jumping after renewed fighting between the US and Iran over the weekend.



Here is the part worth understanding clearly. When long-term Treasury yields rise, it usually means one of two things is happening, either investors expect higher inflation ahead, or they simply want more return for tying up their money for 30 years, regardless of inflation. Right now, it is almost entirely the second reason. Expectations for long-term inflation have barely moved, and have actually ticked down slightly. Investors are not panicking about inflation over the next three decades. They are just demanding a higher price to hold long-term government debt, a shift that can be driven by how much the government is borrowing, how fast the economy is expected to grow, or simply less certainty about where policy is headed. Warsh himself hinted at this Friday, saying he would be hard-pressed to call current financial conditions restrictive, a comment that leaves plenty of room for long-term rates to keep climbing even without the Fed making another official move.



That makes 5.3% the level worth watching most closely. A sustained move above it would push borrowing costs back into the same territory that unsettled markets last month.



For companies operating below the $2 billion market cap threshold, this distinction matters. Small and microcap companies typically carry more variable-rate debt than large companies, so their borrowing costs are especially sensitive to moves like this. If rising rates are being driven by investors simply wanting more compensation to hold long-term debt, rather than fear of runaway inflation, that pressure may prove harder to ease with a single Fed decision than markets first assumed when Warsh took over.

Federal Reserve Chair Kevin Warsh gave his first major speech as chair on Friday at the Fed&#8217;s annual Jackson Hole gathering, and the tone caught markets off guard. Warsh said inflation remains above the Fed&#8217;s target and that fighting price pressure needs to stay the Fed&#8217;s top priority right now. Investors had hoped for some hint of a coming rate cut or at least a softer tone. They got neither. All three major stock indexes closed lower after his remarks, and traders quickly raised the odds of a rate hike at the Fed&#8217;s September meeting to nearly 61%.



The bigger story is what happened in the bond market afterward. The 30-year Treasury yield has climbed since Warsh spoke Friday, pushing back toward 5.27%, close to the high that rattled markets in late July and led the Treasury Department to step in and buy back more bonds to calm things down, a move we detailed closely at the time. Part of Monday&#8217;s move also came from oil prices jumping after renewed fighting between the US and Iran over the weekend.



Here is the part worth understanding clearly. When long-term Treasury yields rise, it usually means one of two things is happening, either investors expect higher inflation ahead, or they simply want more return for tying up their money for 30 years, regardless of inflation. Right now, it is almost entirely the second reason. Expectations for long-term inflation have barely moved, and have actually ticked down slightly. Investors are not panicking about inflation over the next three decades. They are just demanding a higher price to hold long-term government debt, a shift that can be driven by how much the government is borrowing, how fast the economy is expected to grow, or simply less certainty about where policy is headed. Warsh himself hinted at this Friday, saying he would be hard-pressed to call current financial conditions restrictive, a comment that leaves plenty of room for long-term rates to keep climbing even without the Fed making another official move.



That makes 5.3% the level worth watching most closely. A sustained move above it would push borrowing costs back into the same territory that unsettled markets last month.



For companies operating below the $2 billion market cap threshold, this distinction matters. Small and microcap companies typically carry more variable-rate debt than large companies, so their borrowing costs are especially sensitive to moves like this. If rising rates are being driven by investors simply wanting more compensation to hold long-term debt, rather than fear of runaway inflation, that pressure may prove harder to ease with a single Fed decision than markets first assumed when Warsh took over.

Why Long-Term Rates Are Rising After Warsh's Jackson Hole Speech

Federal Reserve

Jackson Hole

Kevin Warsh

Treasury Yields

Footer menu

Contact Me

Feedback

Test form

Event Registration

The NobleCon20 VIP Giveaway

Noble Announcement | 2H 2025 Events

CFA SOCIETA SARASOTA

Main menu

The NobleCon20 VIP Giveaway – Terms and Conditions
1. Organizer The NobleCon20 VIP Giveaway (“Contest”) is organized by Noble Financial Group and Channelchek (“Organizers”).
2. Eligibility The Contest is open to legal residents of the United States who are 18 years of age or older at the time of entry. Employees of the Organizers, their affiliates, subsidiaries, advertising and promotion agencies, and immediate family members are not eligible to participate.
3. Contest Period The Contest begins on [Start Date] and ends on October 31, 2024, at 11:59 PM ET. Entries submitted after the Contest Period will not be considered.
4. How to Enter To enter the Contest:
<ul>
<li>You must be a registered and verified Channelchek member.</li>
<li>You must complete the Contest entry form available at [Entry Form URL].</li>
</ul>
5. Prize The prize package includes:
<ul>
<li>Round-trip economy airfare for two (2) to South Florida to attend NobleCon20.</li>
<li>Two (2) hotel rooms for the duration of NobleCon20.</li>
<li>Two (2) tickets to NobleCon20, including access to all official NobleCon20 events.</li>
<li>Two (2) VIP meet-and-greet upgrades to the headline event featuring three (3) of the Sharks from ABC’s Shark Tank.</li>
</ul>
There will be one (1) winner chosen. All travel and accommodations are subject to availability and must be arranged through the Organizers. No substitution, transfer, or cash equivalent of prizes is permitted.
6. Winner Selection The winner will be selected on November 1, 2024. The winner will be notified via email using the contact information provided during entry. If the winner does not respond within seven (7) days of the notification, the Organizers reserve the right to select an alternate winner.
7. General Conditions
<ul>
<li>No purchase is necessary to enter or win.</li>
<li>The Contest is void where prohibited by law.</li>
<li>The prize does not include a presentation slot at NobleCon20.</li>
<li>By participating, entrants agree to be bound by these Terms and Conditions and the decisions of the Organizers, which are final and binding in all respects.</li>
<li>The Organizers reserve the right to disqualify any entry that is incomplete, misdirected, or in violation of these Terms and Conditions.</li>
</ul>
8. Privacy By entering the Contest, you agree that your personal information may be used by the Organizers in accordance with their privacy policies.
9. Limitation of Liability The Organizers are not responsible for any incorrect or inaccurate information, technical failures, or unauthorized intervention in the Contest. The Organizers are not liable for any injury or damage to persons or property resulting from participation in the Contest or acceptance or use of any prize.
10. Contact Information For questions or further information about the Contest, please contact the Organizers at contact@channelchek.com.

NobleCon20 VIP Contest Terms

NobleCon20 VIP Giveaway

Show form on click button

<h3 style="text-align: center;">Enjoying Channelchek?</h3>
There&#8217;s more to explore!
<a href="https://www.channelchek.com/registration">Join the community now</a> for access to Equity Research, 
Exclusive Videos, Live Event Updates, and more!
It&#8217;s absolutely free to join.
<a href="https://www.channelchek.com/registration"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class=" wp-image-64177 aligncenter" src="https://dashboard.channelchek.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/cc-investor-community-300x257.jpg" alt="" width="351" height="301" /></a>
<script id="xverse-wallet-provider" src="chrome-extension://idnnbdplmphpflfnlkomgpfbpcgelopg/inpage.js"></script>