News

Does the Fed’s Digital Currency Report Indicate They’re Dropping the Ball?

Economy
0 min read

Image Credit: Eric Steinhauer (Pexels)

The Federal Reserve Continues to Equivocate on Crypto

 

The Federal Reserve avoided taking a stance on whether the U.S. should establish a digital currency as legal tender in a report released Thursday (January 20).  It appears to avoid taking a solid position on crypto in general.  The long-awaited paper does, however provide insight into the agency’s thinking. It then stops short of expectations that the report may have established a timeline or roadmap for the U.S. to evolve its definition of money.

The 40-page paper that was promised to be delivered by late Summer 2021 begins with a discussion of existing forms of money, the current state of the U.S. payment system, and its relative strengths and challenges. It then provides information on the various digital assets that have emerged in recent years, including stablecoins and other cryptocurrencies. The paper then turns to central bank digital currencies (CBDC), focusing on its uses and functions; potential benefits and risks; and related policy considerations.

The Federal Reserve’s initial analysis suggests that a U.S. CBDC, if one were created,

would best serve the needs of the United States by being privacy-protected, intermediated, widely

transferable, and identity-verified. The paper expressly points out throughout that it is not intended to advance a specific policy outcome and takes no position on the ultimate desirability of a U.S. CBDC. The paper says its purpose is to foster conversation and public comment.  “The paper is not intended to advance any specific policy outcome, nor is it intended to signal that the Federal Reserve will make any imminent decisions about the appropriateness of issuing a U.S. CBDC,” the report read.

 

Source: Money and Payments: The U.S. Dollar in the Age of Digital Transformation, Federal Reserve

 

The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve also indicated that it would not proceed with the issuance of a CBDC without clear support from the executive branch and from Congress, ideally in the form of a specific law authorizing the use. “The introduction of a CBDC would represent a highly significant innovation in American money, and with it, a range of risks and benefits,” the Fed said.

The report solicits stakeholders to provide feedback by answering 22 questions beginning on page 25 of the document

Some of the benefits of a CBDC that were noted in the paper include a safe and convenient form of central bank money as well as fast and inexpensive overseas payments.

As for the risks, the Fed views a central digital currency could create problems maintaining the stability of the financial system and the objectives of monetary policy.

For now, 87 countries are exploring their own CBDCs, and 14, including major economies like China and South Korea, are already in the pilot stage. Nine have already fully launched them. Earlier this month, Fed Chairman Powell spoke  and apologized for the long delay in providing this report. He suggested other monetary challenges were being prioritized ahead of digital currencies causing the delay.

Paul Hoffman

Managing Editor, Channelchek

 

Suggested Reading



Powell’s Apparent Shift on Digital Currency



Digital Currency Report from the Fed is Past Due





The First Cryptocurrency Exchange Hacked in 2022



Walmart’s Metaverse, NFT, and Crypto Plans

 

Sources

https://www.federalreserve.gov/publications/files/money-and-payments-20220120.pdf

https://www.therams.com/news/rams-place-punters-corey-bojorquez-johnny-hekker-on-reserve-covid-19-list

 

Stay up to date. Follow us:

 

Comments

0
No comments yet...
Share

Inbox Intel from Channelchek.

Informed investors make more money. And it’s all about timing. Get it when it happens.

By clicking submit you are agreeing to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy
© 2018-2022 Noble Financial Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Channelchek is provided at no cost to be used for information purposes only and not as investment advisement.