Vast majority of taxpayers had lower liability. In an April 15^th article, the Tax Foundation noted the estimated net impact of the TCJA is that 80% of filers had lower tax liability in 2018, with another 15% having no material change. Only 5% of taxpayers were estimated to have paid more in taxes.

And the impact was widespread. Using IRS data, The Heritage Foundation found that average households in every congressional district got a tax cut in 2018. More than 88% of individual taxpayers in every district and every state got a tax cut or no change in their 2018 liability.

Average individual income taxes down. On average, all households paid roughly $1,300 less in individual income taxes in 2018 than they would have under the old law.

The size of the refund does not paint an accurate picture. As part of the tax overhaul, the Treasury Department changed its withholding tables, which in some cases meant that tax cuts came in the form of larger paychecks throughout the year, but smaller or no refunds at filing. In other words, the tax cut was there, but taxpayers did not see it as it came in 26 paychecks as opposed to one lump sum.

Vast majority of taxpayers had lower liability. In an April 15^th article, the Tax Foundation noted the estimated net impact of the TCJA is that 80% of filers had lower tax liability in 2018, with another 15% having no material change. Only 5% of taxpayers were estimated to have paid more in taxes.

And the impact was widespread. Using IRS data, The Heritage Foundation found that average households in every congressional district got a tax cut in 2018. More than 88% of individual taxpayers in every district and every state got a tax cut or no change in their 2018 liability.

Average individual income taxes down. On average, all households paid roughly $1,300 less in individual income taxes in 2018 than they would have under the old law.

The size of the refund does not paint an accurate picture. As part of the tax overhaul, the Treasury Department changed its withholding tables, which in some cases meant that tax cuts came in the form of larger paychecks throughout the year, but smaller or no refunds at filing. In other words, the tax cut was there, but taxpayers did not see it as it came in 26 paychecks as opposed to one lump sum.

Average refunds are down. The average refund was down at the start of the tax season by 8%, which increased to nearly 17% by mid-February.

The impact overwhelming favors “the rich.” The highest earning 1% can expect tax cuts averaging more than $51,000 in 2018, more than what the median American worker makes in a year. The lowest income households (those making less than $25,000) got an average tax cut of about $40.

In the long run, rates will increase.  According to Matthew Yglesias, “It’s actually the case that in the long run TCJA will raise many working- and middle-class people’s taxes. To conform to budget reconciliation rules, Republicans made it so the nonregressive tax cuts largely expire after 10 years while the revenue-raisers and the business tax cuts are permanent.”

Average refunds are down. The average refund was down at the start of the tax season by 8%, which increased to nearly 17% by mid-February.

The impact overwhelming favors “the rich.” The highest earning 1% can expect tax cuts averaging more than $51,000 in 2018, more than what the median American worker makes in a year. The lowest income households (those making less than $25,000) got an average tax cut of about $40.

In the long run, rates will increase.  According to Matthew Yglesias, “It’s actually the case that in the long run TCJA will raise many working- and middle-class people’s taxes. To conform to budget reconciliation rules, Republicans made it so the nonregressive tax cuts largely expire after 10 years while the revenue-raisers and the business tax cuts are permanent.”

Why do so many people continue to believe the TCJA did not lower their taxes? According to the New York Times, the view “appears to flow from a sustained – and misleading – effort by liberal opponents of the law to brand [Trump’s tax reform] as a broad middle-class tax increase.” According to the IRS, for the week ending April 12, 2019 the relevant tax statistics for the filing year were as follows: total returns received – 119.4 million, up 0.7% from the same period in the prior year; total returns processed were 115.7 million, up 0.8% year-over-year; total refunds were 84.4 million, down 1.9%; total refund amount $235.9 billion, down 3.1%; and average refund $2,795, down 1.3% year over year. What the IRS statistics do not capture, however, is the additional weekly take home pay received by taxpayers due to the adjusted withholding schedules. So, with the average refund through April 12^th nearly flat year-over-year and with taxpayers having received more in their paychecks throughout the year it would appear that the TCJA did actually reduce the vast majority of people’s taxes.

Sources:

The Trump Tax Cuts: Separating Economic Fact From Fiction, Adam Michel and Cobi Williams Foundation for Economic Education, October 08, 2018

The middle class needs a tax cut: Trump didn’t give it to them, Isabel V. Sawhill and Christopher Pulliam, Brookings Institution, October 16, 2018

The First Filing Season under the TCJA, Erica York, Tax Foundation, April 15, 2019

The Three Numbers To Know About The TCJA In 2018, Howard Gleckman, Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center, April 18, 2019

Average tax refunds are up. And by the way, the IRS says it has $1.4 billion waiting to be collected, Michelle Singletary, The Washington Post, March 14, 2019

Why millions of people are getting hit with a surprise tax bill this year, Matthew Yglesias, Vox, February 6, 2019

Filing Season Statistics for Week Ending April 12, 2019, IRS

Why do so many people continue to believe the TCJA did not lower their taxes? According to the New York Times, the view “appears to flow from a sustained – and misleading – effort by liberal opponents of the law to brand [Trump’s tax reform] as a broad middle-class tax increase.” According to the IRS, for the week ending April 12, 2019 the relevant tax statistics for the filing year were as follows: total returns received – 119.4 million, up 0.7% from the same period in the prior year; total returns processed were 115.7 million, up 0.8% year-over-year; total refunds were 84.4 million, down 1.9%; total refund amount $235.9 billion, down 3.1%; and average refund $2,795, down 1.3% year over year. What the IRS statistics do not capture, however, is the additional weekly take home pay received by taxpayers due to the adjusted withholding schedules. So, with the average refund through April 12^th nearly flat year-over-year and with taxpayers having received more in their paychecks throughout the year it would appear that the TCJA did actually reduce the vast majority of people’s taxes.

Sources:

The Trump Tax Cuts: Separating Economic Fact From Fiction, Adam Michel and Cobi Williams Foundation for Economic Education, October 08, 2018

The middle class needs a tax cut: Trump didn’t give it to them, Isabel V. Sawhill and Christopher Pulliam, Brookings Institution, October 16, 2018

The First Filing Season under the TCJA, Erica York, Tax Foundation, April 15, 2019

The Three Numbers To Know About The TCJA In 2018, Howard Gleckman, Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center, April 18, 2019

Average tax refunds are up. And by the way, the IRS says it has $1.4 billion waiting to be collected, Michelle Singletary, The Washington Post, March 14, 2019

Why millions of people are getting hit with a surprise tax bill this year, Matthew Yglesias, Vox, February 6, 2019

Filing Season Statistics for Week Ending April 12, 2019, IRS